Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   No comments

Life Arts

Hopefully, Grammar Schools Will Go Back to Teaching Grammar

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Stephen L. Carter recently wrote an opinion piece titled: It Is to Be Hoped That "Hopefully" Will Fade Away. 

Unfortunately, the article reveals that Professor Carter doesn't understand what sentence adverbs are or what they do. Nor does he understand what the mission of the Oxford English Dictionary has always been.

Carter wrote, "Alas, the editors of the Oxford English Dictionary long ago caved on "hopefully"." That sentence suggests that Professor Carter is unaware of the guiding principle that the lexicographers who compiled the Oxford English Dictionary have followed since 1857, when work on the dictionary began. The Oxford English Dictionary was never intended to prescribe correct or acceptable usage of the English language. 

Instead, it has always been intended to describe how English has been used in the past and is currently being used. Thus, the Oxford English Dictionary has always been descriptivist, not prescriptivist. It therefore makes no sense to complain that the Oxford English Dictionary has "caved" on something.

Professor Carter feels that hopefully should not be used as a sentence adverb. Yet like many other people who have complained about how people use hopefully, he doesn't understand what a sentence adverb is. I can tell that by the examples that he gives, such as "Ferociously, battles over misuse are likely to continue." In that unnatural sentence, ferociously is not a sentence adverb!

A sentence adverb isn't just an adverb that appears at the beginning of a sentence. In fact, a sentence adverb doesn't even have to appear at the beginning of the sentence. A sentence adverb is a disjunct. A disjunct is an adverb or adverbial phrase that is not essential to the meaning of the clause or sentence. Instead, it expresses the speaker or writer's attitude toward the idea expressed by that clause or sentence. 

Consider the following sentence: "I think that it is fortunate that it didn't rain yesterday." You can collapse, "I think that it is fortunate that" into one word: fortunately. Thus, you can say, "Fortunately, it didn't rain yesterday." Notice that the word fortunately does not modify anything in the sentence. Nor does it alter the meaning of the sentence as a whole. Instead, it concisely expresses the speaker or writer's opinion about what the sentence is saying. Unfortunately, some people imagine that a sentence adverb should modify the verb in a sentence. 

If it doesn't, they mistakenly conclude that the sentence adverb is dangling. They don't realize that a sentence adverb is a disjunct. It isn't intended to modify anything in the sentence!

Curiously, many self-appointed grammar experts have taken a stand against the use of hopefully as a sentence adverb while ignoring the use of other sentence adverbs, such as curiously, frankly, and regrettably. Hopefully, someone who has the opportunity to reach a large audience will eventually explain what a sentence adverb is and what it does! The knowledge of how to use sentence adverbs can help one write more concisely. The ability to identify sentence adverbs in someone else's speech or writing makes it easier to separate statements of fact from expressions of opinion.
  
I agree with Professor Carter that grammar and usage do matter in the larger scheme of things. The ideas and skills that one learns from studying grammar are essential not only for good writing but also for logical thinking. Since the days of ancient Greece, grammar was an essential part of the curriculum that prepared a freeborn person to take part in a democratic or republican form of government. Grammar was one of the classical liberal arts, which were called the liberal arts  because they were the studies considered appropriate for free people, as opposed to slaves. 

Thus, it should have been obvious to anyone with a classical education that the decision to stop teaching grammar in public schools posed a threat to freedom, equality, and democracy.

Laurie Endicott Thomas is the author of the upcoming book Not Trivial:  How Studying the Traditional Liberal Arts Can Set You Free, which will be available from Freedom of Speech Publishing (freedomofspeechpublishing.com). 

She blogs at http://www.nottrivial.blogspot.com

 

http://www.nottrivial.blogspot.com

Laurie has worked as a medical editor and writer for many years. She is the author of Not Trivial: How Studying the Traditional Liberal Arts Can Set You Free.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Unspeakable Original Intent of the Second Amendment

Even Small Amounts of Any Animal-Source Foods Are Bad for You

Is Dyslexia Really a Learning Disability?

Eating Meat, Dairy, Eggs, and Fish Can Make Your Breath Stink!

Why Did the Educators in the U.S. Abandon Phonics?

Starches Are the Solution to Your Weight and Health Problems

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments