Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Entertainment Will Not Save Us

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

opednews.com

The ancient Romans were fond of games. So fond that a politician's popularity could hinge on the games that he organized during his tenure as a Curile Aedile, one of the career steps for a man rising in the Roman political establishment. To be known for putting on outstanding games earned a man votes for future positions in government.

Roman games served the purpose of diverting the attention of the common Romans away from many of their problems, and helped to keep them pacified while the elite Romans squeezed the system for all that they could get. Of course this political tool was not unique to Ancient Rome. Entertainment is still commonly used as a means for distracting the population from serious matters.

In British Columbia this month we have the Winter Olympics, a prime example not only of distracting the public from pressing issues and government corruption, but also a convenient tool for the government to transfer yet more public funds into the hands of their backers in the private sector.

Much ado is being made about the games, a constant barrage of hype in the media infecting all areas of society. Meanwhile, more pressing matters slip by with hardly any notice at all. There is more short term profit to be made from the hype than getting serious about fixing problems.

This year is the UN International Year of Biodiversity, and the Canadian government has paid lip service, issuing a statement about how much it is doing to preserve biodiversity. Too bad it is not enough.

The planet that we live on has evolved an intricate web of life forms that make existence as we know it possible. That web depends on a wide diversity of biological organisms to function the way that it does. As the mix of flora and fauna that comprises the web changes, every thing is affected, including humans. There is nothing more important to us than protecting that web, yet we constantly fail to do it.

The reason that we fail is exemplified in a report recently issued by the Lincoln Institute titled Planning For Climate Change In The West. In the announcement of the report it says "Local officials engaged in planning for climate change must focus on the economic savings of mitigating and adapting to climate change..." Everyone nods their head and says that sounds right. But is it?

It makes as much sense as saying "Local officials engaged in planning for a hostile invasion and take over of their country must focus on the economic savings of mitigating and adapting to that invasion." Or "Local officials engaged in planning for a killer pandemic must focus on the economic savings of mitigating and adapting to the pandemic."

Does it make sense to consider economic savings over the defense of one's country, or over stopping a killer pandemic? Certainly not, nor does it make sense to consider economic issues when dealing with biodiversity. We can rearrange our economics and still survive, there is no guarantee that we can radically alter the diversity of our eco-system and still maintain our society.

Today there is no question about whether or not we need to alter our economics. We have to if we are going to protect the environment and the future of our descendants. Our economic system is built on growth, capitalism is a growth system, and growth is killing us because it is taking more from our eco-system than can be sustainably replaced. Biodiversity is being radically altered.

In a recent report the New Economics Foundation hit the nail on the head when they said "economic growth no longer possible for rich countries." Corollary to that is that it isn't possible for poor countries, either, unless it comes at the expense of rich countries. No wonder those in charge who get rich off of the current system prefer to give us entertainment instead of real solutions to our problem.

 

Jerry West grew up on a farm in California and is currently Editor and Publisher of THE RECORD newspaper in Gold River, BC. Graduate with Honors and graduate school, UC Berkeley. Member, Phi Beta Kappa. Vietnam veteran and Former Sgt. USMC
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

There Is No Cornucopia

The New Feudalism

Environmental Sustainability - The Core Issue of Our Times

Who Put Christ In The Solstice?

Tea-baggers Are A Riot

Why The Republicans Lost

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This documentary by Canadian Paul Manly about the ... by Brian O'Moore on Thursday, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:56:22 AM