Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   2 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

EFCA: "Third Way?" No Way!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 3/25/09

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

Whenever you accept a naked man’s offer of his shirt, you can be sure of two things:

1.   At the end of the day, somebody is going to have a new shirt;
2.   It will not be you.

So it is with the latest counterproposal to the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA).  This one comes from the “Committee for a Level Playing Field.”  Committee members are self-proclaimed “progressive” retailers Costco, Starbucks, and Whole Foods.  

 

The Committee’s lobbyist in Congress is Clinton White House veteran and self-styled “pro-labor Democrat” Lanny Davis.  Mr. Davis is peddling on the Hill an alternative to the EFCA now before the Senate.  He calls the plan a “Third Way” to achieve the legislation’s key objectives.

A “third try” is more like it since the business community’s first two tries were non-starters.  To this “Third Way” we can only say, “No way!”  This is the lamest effort yet to try to derail the EFCA and it must not succeed.

To no one’s surprise, big business has opposed EFCA from the start.  At first, the business community took the position that, “This legislation is no good for you, our workers.  And we have only your interests at heart!  And besides, the timing is terrible!”  That was the naked man offering his shirt.

The illogic of these statements becomes clear on a moment’s reflection: a bad idea does not become a good idea because it is differently timed.  Conversely, when is it ever the wrong time to do the right thing?

Next, Big Business cried, “This legislation takes away the secret ballot!  It is undemocratic … it’s un-American!  The secret ballot is the cornerstone of American democracy!”  That argument cast aside two facts: (a) the legislation does not take away the secret ballot; and (b) American democracy is not at stake, only union membership – and money – is at stake.  

Next up was the “Alliance to Save Main Street Jobs” (same naked man, different shirt).  They stepped in to bleat: “This legislation will wreck the economy!”  But the Alliance’s proof was unpersuasive, as I describe here.

Now comes the “Committee for a Level Playing Field,” Lanny Davis, paid spokesman.  The Committee offers a “Third Way” forward (thus conceding that their previous ways got them nowhere).  

The “Compromise”

As a “compromise,” the Committee proposes to retain secret-ballot union elections.  In other words, it wants to get rid of the card-check provision of the card-check legislation. It also wants to eliminate binding arbitration.  Those are the two main elements of the legislation.

The Committee wants employers to have the right to apply to the NLRB to decertify a union.  (This reminds me of the courtroom tactic of trying to disqualify the other side’s attorney, which seems to be a favorite ploy when the moving party realizes he has no case.)  Now, only employees can move to decertify their union because, after all, it’s their union.

The Committee is willing to concede tougher penalties for unfair labor practices as long as the provisions apply to union and management equally.  It will also agree to an unspecified time interval within which secret-ballot elections must be held.

In return, the Committee offers to give unions “equal access” to employees during non-working hours for campaigning purposes.  That’s no concession; unions have that much access to employees now, after hours and off-premises.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rick Wise is an industrial psychologist and retired management consultant. For 15 years, he was managing director of ValueNet International, Inc. Before starting ValueNet, Rick was director, corporate training and, later, director, corporate (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HOW TO AVOID THE UNION

WILL GOP REBUT OBAMA'S EDUCATION SPEECH?

A Conservative's "12 Days of Christmas"

"I Don't Want to Pay for Somebody Else's Health Care"

Reconsidering Iraq: What If We Had Been Greeted as Liberators?

FairTax: Too Good To Be True?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Very well You have expressed what I think will mak... by Jason Paz on Wednesday, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:01:39 PM
the general "good" that can come from un... by Nick van Nes on Thursday, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:12:55 PM