Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Duplicate Payments to AIG Counterparties?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 3/20/09

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

opednews.com

The easiest way to tell this story is to post the text of a letter I sent to my Senators and Congressman yesterday.  Here it is: 

"March 19, 2009  

Sen. Christopher Dodd, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, Hon. John B. Larson  

Re:    Duplicate Payments to AIG Counterparties?  

Gentlemen, 

I noticed that several prominent financial services firms that received TARP funds last year also appear on the recently-released list of counterparties to be paid by AIG from bailout funds.   

These firms include AIG International, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo/Wachovia, and possibly others.  The total of counterparty payments due to these firms from AIG appears to be at least $30,900,000,000. 

This presents the possibility that some of these firms could have applied for and received TARP funds last fall, in anticipation of defaults by AIG; and are now in line to receive payment by AIG.  Thus, they stand to be paid twice, with the money for both payments coming from taxpayers. 

This possibility raises three questions: 

1.                 What controls, if any, are in place to guard against this kind of double-dipping?   

2.                 If no controls are in place, what steps will be taken to forestall the possibility of such duplicate payments and who will take them?   

3.                 If duplicate payments have already been made, what steps will be taken to recover the money and who will take them? 

In the ideal world, companies receiving duplicate payments to the same account would return the money on their own.  But, as recent experience has amply shown, these firms cannot be trusted to "do the right thing" under almost any circumstances.  This would certainly be one of them. 

Could you gentlemen please look into this matter and let the public know the extent of any such double-dipping?  If, as I suspect, double-dipping is found, what steps are being taken to protect taxpayer interests? 

Thank you.                                                          

Very truly yours,                                                      

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rick Wise is an industrial psychologist and retired management consultant. For 15 years, he was managing director of ValueNet International, Inc. Before starting ValueNet, Rick was director, corporate training and, later, director, corporate (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HOW TO AVOID THE UNION

WILL GOP REBUT OBAMA'S EDUCATION SPEECH?

A Conservative's "12 Days of Christmas"

"I Don't Want to Pay for Somebody Else's Health Care"

Reconsidering Iraq: What If We Had Been Greeted as Liberators?

FairTax: Too Good To Be True?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments