Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
  1
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  1
2 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
21 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Dirty, Filthy Global Warming Deniers

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

We all have someething in common,the desire for cleanliness.

There is no doubt that global warming deniers are sending vast amounts of money to media reporters and spokespersons on the right. According to The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) hundreds of millions are being spent on global warming denial lobbying and advertising. At the same time, deniers are fighting legislation to clean up our environment.

Taking a few hours out of my life one day, I went to Rush Limbaugh's website to find out who his advertisers were there. He had links to The Heritage Foundation. There I found the link to the Minority staff report to the US Senate and Environment and Public works committee. It is a global warming denial report. Limbaugh obviously believes that report. And evidentially so does George Will because that is where I found most of the words he wrote in his Newsweek and Washington Post articles denying global warming.

Global warming deniers are convinced that these claims of climate change are vastly overrated and based on climate models that are inaccurate and faulty. According the Heritage Foundation's Ben Lieberman, "For more than a decade, we have opposed costly and ill-advised measures that were promoted as panaceas for global warming."

They oppose anything that might cost money and they especially oppose the Environmental Protection Agency.

Ben Lieberman likes to refer to the 2008 U.S. Senate Minority Report on the Environment when he claims..."The cost of the policy prescriptions being debated in Poznan is very high and would be worth imposing only if global warming were truly a dire threat. Growing scientific evidence casts doubt on whether global warming constitutes such a threat, including the fact that 2008 is about to go into the books as a cooler year than 2007."



It seems that someone went out and found some scientists who were willing to sign a list denying global warming. I hear the cigarette industry found some scientists to hide the dangers of smoking and the drug industry found some to vouch for the safety of Valium.

Environmental Defense however says the last ten years have been the hottest and 2008 was still hotter than in the previous ten year period. Isn't it amazing what you can do with statistics?

EDF also says that "$450 million is the amount spent on lobbying and political contributions by opponents of global warming action in 2008; that 52 is the number of public spokespersons engaged by polluters and the ideological right to spread disinformation about global warming online and in the media; that 2,340 is the number of paid lobbyists working in Washington on climate change in 2008; that 7 in 8 is the Proportion of climate lobbyists advocating against climate action. And that $45 million is the amount spent on global warming denial advertising by the coal industry in 2008. Opponents of global warming are spending $1.23 million/day on lobbying and political contributions alone.

At least someone has a job.

According to EDF zero is the Number of retractions and/or corrections published by the Washington Post after running a column by George Will containing demonstrably false claims about global warming."

How can The Heritage Foundation be so wrong? One would think that such an influential group would have some climate scientists on its global warming experts list, but I could only find policy analysts. No scientists, let alone climate scientists.

Regardless of where you stand on the issue of global warming and climate change, I want to remind you of some very important things that we all can agree upon. Humans do not want to live in filth.

No one likes to breathe polluted air. No one wants to drink bad water. No one wants their children to be contaminated with heavy metals and gender-bending endocrine disruptors. No one wants to see our forests dying from acid rain. No one wants to see dead zones in the oceans. No one wants to see different endangered species dying off from contamination and draught. No one wants the rain forests to disappear and become poisoned from drilling for oil and clear cutting.

Lead author and researcher Chris Jones said at a climate conference in Copenhagen. "On any kind of pragmatic timescale, I think we should see loss of the Amazon forest as irreversible."

Clearly the world is losing species, rain forests, clean air and water, and ultimately human life. We cannot survive in a filthy, dirty environment. And just remember, the hotter it gets and the less water you have, the dirtier it is going to get.

 

www.pollettplayers.com

My credentials: BA in political science, minor in data processing and creative writing, Doctor of Metaphysics (Beattles style), Yoga teacher, mother, grandmother, married with 7 grown children, his and mine. Ageless. Creative Activities: Artist, (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

PLASTIC BAGS ARE DANGEROUS

Dangerous Ozone Depletion and UV Levels Increasing

FAKE HORMONES DISRUPT ENDOCRINE SYSTEMS

US Petroleum Exports

Dirty, Filthy Global Warming Deniers

The Do-Nothing Party Wake

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 people are discussing this page, with 21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
What about all those "Sun Rises in the East D... by M. Bennett on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:51:28 AM
Global Warming is another Government lie, trying t... by Don Bybee on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:43:43 AM
Talk about mud in the waters.....neither religion ... by cpaddock 1252335501 on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:45:45 AM
You're right, I forgot, God has nothing to do ... by Don Bybee on Wednesday, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:55:42 PM
There is a huge body of evidence and dozens o... by Bill Cain on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:04:40 PM
That's how much the fedgov spends on climate r... by Darren Wolfe on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:45:50 PM
I rest my case. Thank you for some insight that fe... by Bill Cain on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:36:14 PM
A big problem with Gore's credibility is his refus... by Darren Wolfe on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:50:26 PM
This article is an example of malicious pseudo-ide... by Theon Lyreal on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:02:21 PM
Al Gore wrote a book decades ago - Earth in t... by Caronome on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:22:06 PM
Al Gore also said this: Published in the Ag Journ... by gail combs on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:46:34 PM
Thanks for your comments to my article. It is good... by Linda Schreiber on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:26:31 PM
The idea that there is a large group of people cla... by Darren Wolfe on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:03:08 PM
Some people will fall for anything and call others... by Guy Razer on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:29:46 PM
It's telling that every global warming denier ... by Perry Logan on Sunday, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:15:41 AM
Just personally, I think anyone who denies that ma... by William Whitten on Sunday, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:16:18 PM
I'd like to amend my last post with this caveat. ... by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:25:25 AM
  The problem with this "problem" i... by Richard Lee on Sunday, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:18:21 PM
2nd to last sentence: Personally I say, look to th... by Richard Lee on Sunday, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:33:01 PM
There is little question that the world has gotten... by sesquiculus on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:31:38 PM
To those of you who say the sun is making us hotte... by Linda Schreiber on Sunday, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:11:36 PM