Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   17 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Cliff Hanger: The President's Unnecessary and Unwise Concessions

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 12/20/12

Become a Fan
  (104 fans)


Why is the President back to making premature and unnecessary concessions to Republicans?

Two central issues in the 2012 presidential election were whether the Bush tax cuts should be ended for people earning over $250,000, and whether Social Security and Medicare should be protected from future budget cuts.

The President said yes to both. Republicans said no. Obama won.

But apparently the President is now offering to continue Bush tax cuts for people earning between $250,000 and $400,000, and to cut Social Security by reducing annual cost-of-living adjustments.

These concessions aren't necessary. If the nation goes over the so-called "fiscal cliff" and tax rates return to what they were under Bill Clinton, Democrats can then introduce a tax cut for everyone earning under $250,000 and make it retroactive to the start of the year.

They can combine it with a spending bill that makes up for most of the cuts scheduled to go into effect in January. Republicans would be hard-pressed not to sign on.

Social Security should not be part of any such deal anyway. By law, it can't contribute to the budget deficit. It's only permitted to spend money from the Social Security trust fund.

Besides, the President's proposed reduction in annual Social Security cost-of-living adjustments would save only $122 billion over 10 years. Yet it would significantly harm the elderly.

It defies logic and fairness to give more tax cuts to the wealthy while cutting benefits for the near-poor.

The median income of Americans over 65 is less than $20,000 a year. Nearly 70 percent of them depend on Social Security for more than half of this. The average Social Security benefit is less than $15,000 a year.

Even Social Security's current cost-of-living adjustment understates the true impact of inflation on elderly recipients, who spend far more on health care than anyone else -- including annual increases in Medicare premiums.

Hands off Social Security. If the Republicans are willing to raise tax rates on high earners but demand more spending cuts in return, the President should offer larger cuts in defense spending and corporate welfare.

 

http://robertreich.org/

Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor and Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, has a new film, "Inequality for All," to be released September 27. He blogs at www.robertreich.org.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Republican's Big Lies About Jobs (And Why Obama Must Repudiate Them)

Paul Ryan Still Doesn't Get It

What Mitt Romney Really Represents

The Minimum Wage, Guns, Healthcare, and the Meaning of a Decent Society

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold The Nation Hostage Again and Again

The Gas Wars

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

President Obama isn't making a concession; he's ma... by Rico D. on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:52:34 AM
All Obama has to do is stand firm.   The... by Guitar Chris on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:22:33 AM
It's mind over matter. They don't mind and you don... by Paul Repstock on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:35:56 AM
Reisch is either especially naive or ON THE TAKE a... by Poor old Dirt farmer on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:27:38 AM
PODF, wow, who are you?  Yes, in some ways, M... by Bayard Waterbury on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:26:40 PM
In my opinion Its a Bad article when he gives the ... by Poor old Dirt farmer on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:27:08 PM
It is beginning to look more and more like O... by Dennis Kaiser on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:09:08 AM
I am 66 years old and just received my note regard... by Bayard Waterbury on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:31:51 PM
It already has been used by Treasury. Social Secur... by Rico D. on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:06:36 PM
It's the hypocrisy!! Rather, the Duplicity! Mr. Ob... by Rico D. on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:14:36 PM
Is the Bush dinasty.  From Reagan on to the p... by Sister Begonia on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:58:22 AM
Barack Obama is a Democrat.  That means that ... by Bayard Waterbury on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:35:02 PM
That's why she made the reference to Reagan, who b... by Rico D. on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:56:25 PM
Of course, you and I know that the entire Fiscal C... by Bayard Waterbury on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:22:48 PM
"These concessions aren't necessary."Mr. Reich, yo... by John Rachel on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:28:02 PM
Corporations are Foreign Powers, not people. Obama... by Steven G. Erickson on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:48:14 PM
Until about 2 weeks ago, I was getting disturbed a... by Darryl P on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:16:53 AM