Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Can congress use the USA Patriot Act to address CEO bonuses?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Inspiring 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/21/09

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

As congress acted the other night by imposing a 90 percent tax on the bonuses paid out to AIG which is an astonishing amount: there is another useful tool they could use.  A tool which is still on the books.  More on that in a bit.

 

Right now as the economy continues to crumble, dare I say that many citizens of this country do view these chief executives as terrorists?  I would say so.  We are seeing millions of our tax dollars paid out to these chief executives in the form of bonuses thinking they deserve it while many Americans live in abject terror.

 

They are terrorized not knowing if they will have a job tomorrow or have been terrorized by losing their jobs due to the reckless behavior of these CEOs and CFOs.  Their greed became the very weapon of mass destruction that exploded in all of our faces.  This weapon of greed is one that is provable and not just a lie.

 

As Americans continue to lose their jobs, they will go without food and food is the very sustenance of life itself.  We all need to eat in order to survive; yet many go without food as these titans of Wall Street throw lavish parties at our expense.

 

As these chief executives still have a place to call home, an increasing number of Americans are losing theirs.  Not knowing where one will sleep at night is sheer terror.

 

These terrorists do not operate in cells hidden away from any of us as terrorist cells operated by Al Qaeda.  But, they are just as sinister if you ask me and their acts of greed work against the safety and security of this nation.  Some act as if they are gods by stating these contracts cannot be voided.  In fact based upon that thinking we are affording them the very rights which have been denied alleged terrorists in this post 9/11 world.

 

So, here is a proposition to all of our lawmakers.  Can’t they somehow use the much vilified Patriot Act against these CEOs and CFOs?  While originally against the passage of both Patriot Acts, in this case, I would highly support the usage of any provision within it to be used against these chief executives and others who profited at our expense.

 

In this article, U.S. can seize assets, no conviction required, it clearly states, “Any person or group found to be planning to commit a criminal and dangerous act to coerce government policy could lose all assets, regardless of whether they actually commit the crime." under Section 806 of the USA Patriot Act.

 

This section of the Patriot Act allows for the government to seize any and all property.  I would say that bonuses are thought of as property of these chief executives and could very well be seized using this law.

 

At this point Bernard Madoff sits in the Manhattan Correctional Facility after pleading guilty to his Ponzi scheme that bilked investors out of $65 billion dollars.  His wife has since hired her own lawyers, most likely to protect whatever assets may have come from his scheme.  Under this provision of the Patriot Act, "A person whose property is seized under 806 also loses the right to pass property to heirs, creating what the U.S. Constitution calls "the corruption of blood." Couldn’t the U.S. Government just come in and seize whatever assets shared by both and others attached to this scheme?

 

If we are to think that this economic crisis is a national emergency, then please read, "Section 106 of the Patriot Act amends the 1977 law to restore the president's authority to seize property in any national emergency." That 1977 law as one reads was, “weakened under the 1977 International Emergency Powers Act, which limited it to times of war.” I would say that we are fighting a new economic war and the president and congress should use the very provisions passed within the Patriot Act to confront this domestic economic-terrorism.

 

As sickened as most Americans are thinking these chief executives have far superior rights and are treated with kid-gloves, take note of this, "Section 106 also reinforces the government's authority to make its case for property forfeiture in the secrecy of a judge's chambers, and without the defendant present." As you will see, there is a way of dealing with these CEOs and CFOs.

 

While some of you may say these CEOs and CFOs are not foreigners, please read this little beauty, "Section 106 applies only to foreign-owned property, but 806 applies to "any individual," including any American, who the government says is planning to coerce people or government policy through a criminal and dangerous act." I would say that many see these bonuses along with the bailouts as being a dangerous act which has increased our national deficit.

 

As many within congress are hesitant to undo these bailout deals through any claw-back provision, they already passed a law that deals with it and it is called the USA Patriot Act.

 

Who would have thought that one of the vilest pieces of legislation signed into law by former President Bush just may be the very tool we can use to help restore some form of fiscal sanity.  But, does any congressional leader have the temerity to use this law to address our redress of grievances?

 

Author’s email address is, xmjmac@optonline.net

Next Page  1  |  2

 

I am a writer who currently writes pieces for my own blog http://www.mary-macelveen.blogspot.com I have been published by Buzzflash.com, TheLiberalPatriot.org and MikeHersh.com. I was a guest on the Jay Diamond Radio Show on WRKO in Boston and have (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sarah Palin and the prank call: The GOP's self-inflicted November surprise

The $780 billion stimulus bill can be paid down if we legalized marijuana

Are Rod Blagojevich's sixth amendment constitutional rights being violated?

Nadya Suleman is a one woman mini-bailout: Taxpayers may bear the cost

Is John McCain's quest for the presidency effectively over?

Our safety demands that volcanoes and fault lines be monitored

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

i understood the majority of the  bonuses wer... by sometimes blinded on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:50:41 PM
While reading your excellent article, a scene from... by Jason Paz on Sunday, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:08:32 AM