Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  2
2 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
12 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Betraying 'President's Men' Legacy, WaPo Becomes Neocon Propaganda Sheet

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 7 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 3/15/09

opednews.com

Flickr photo by k_hargrav

For Americans who hear the name Washington Post and still think of “All the President’s Men” – brave journalists and editors facing down a corrupt President – today’s version of the newspaper would be a sad disappointment, a betrayal of a noble past.

Over the last three decades, the Post has evolved into a neoconservative propaganda sheet, especially its opinion section which fronted for George W. Bush’s false Iraq-WMD claims, led the long-term bashing of Iraq War critics, and defends whatever actions the Israeli government takes, including the recent war in Gaza and apparently its desire to preemptively bomb Iran.

Rather than a newspaper committed to the truth and favoring a broad debate about important issues, the Washington Post has become an enforcement mechanism for a neocon-dominated Establishment, setting the parameters for permissible points of view and twisting facts for that purpose.

A recent example of this enforcement role was its March 12 lead editorial trashing former U.S. Ambassador Charles “Chas” Freeman for issuing a two-page statement pointing out that his nomination to serve as a top intelligence analyst had been torpedoed by Washington’s powerful Israel Lobby.

To the Post’s editors, however, there apparently is no Israel Lobby; there has been no large-scale organized effort to bend U.S. foreign policy to the interests of Israeli governments over the years. Even the suggestion that such a body exists is a sign of delusion, bigotry and a conspiratorial mindset.

The Post editorial entitled “Blame the ‘Lobby’” declared that “Mr. Freeman issued a two-page screed … in which he described himself as the victim of a shadowy and sinister ‘Lobby’ whose ‘tactics plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency’ and which is ‘intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government.’ Yes, Mr. Freeman was referring to Americans who support Israel – and his statement was a grotesque libel.”

The Post editors then raised the irrelevant fact that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee “says that it took no formal position on Mr. Freeman’s appointment and undertook no lobbying against him” as the choice to chair the National Intelligence Council, which oversees production of intelligence estimates about threats facing the United States.

The Post’s sleight of hand here was to pretend that only a formal AIPAC objection and direct actions by AIPAC personnel could represent the Israel Lobby. In reality, the Israel Lobby is far more expansive than simply AIPAC and includes a wide array of think tanks, contributors to political campaigns, and media commentators, including senior Post editors and columnists.

The Post’s View

In the editorial, the Post’s effort to deny the existence of an Israel Lobby moves on to assert that since U.S. governments have not done everything that some Israeli leaders have demanded – for instance, giving them help in bombing Iran – then, ipso facto, there is no Israel Lobby.

Left out of this sophistry are all the actions that Washington has taken in line with Israeli desires, such as overthrowing Saddam Hussein’s government in Iraq, turning a blind eye to Israel’s use of high-tech U.S. weapons against Palestinian and Lebanese targets, and fending off international condemnation for such acts as the recent war on Gaza.

The Post makes its case this way:

"Let's consider the ambassador's [Freeman’s] broader charge: He describes ‘an inability of the American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any option for U.S. policies in the Middle East opposed by the ruling faction in Israeli politics.’

“That will certainly be news to Israel's ‘ruling faction,’ which in the past few years alone has seen the U.S. government promote a Palestinian election that it opposed; refuse it weapons it might have used for an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities; and adopt a policy of direct negotiations with a regime that denies the Holocaust and that promises to wipe Israel off the map. …

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

http://www.consortiumnews.com

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

To understand why Israel and AIPAC, etc., have thi... by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:53:25 PM
from your comment when you paste part of an articl... by sliphoch on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:13:31 PM
Sliphoch, Kahn is no longer around, so Swaid is w... by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:00:01 PM
The joy of newsletters is that Google will assembl... by Jason Paz on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:58:42 PM
It is intriguing that the criticisms regarding jou... by richard on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:34:32 PM
but please give date you think "the neoconser... by sliphoch on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:20:24 PM
top 10 favorite commentators on OEN. I am baffled... by Elizabeth Molchany on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:05:17 PM
..Boob Woodward was, and is, a spook out of Naval ... by Richard Volaar on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:41:32 PM
is and should be a role model for all journalists ... by Elizabeth Molchany on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:53:55 PM
No one should read or listen to a word of the corp... by Perry Logan on Monday, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:46:51 AM
It is no wonder that they are losing readers left ... by John R Moffett on Monday, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:03:46 AM
I, at 68, have been an admirer of Robert Parry&nbs... by syed mahdi on Monday, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:17:24 PM