Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Barack's Big Betrayal

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 9/9/11

Become a Fan
  (39 fans)

opednews.com

Just over a month ago, I posted an article entitled "Barack's Big Blunder", ascribing his laying of Social Security and Medicare on the pyre of budget cutting to an overeager enthusiasm for budget cutting that played into Republican electoral strategies.

What I said at that time was: Republicans have a compelling political reason to have these programs as a part of the debt ceiling agreement that is even more important to them than their bad faith maneuvering to resurrect this issue one more time before the 2012 election.  That reason is that their party has been scorched on the entitlement third rail, courtesy of Paul Ryan's budget proposal to destroy Medicare. Consequently, they have seen that issue used in a way that had Republicans voting for the Democratic candidate in New York's 26th Congressional District.


Extrapolating that effect to the national election in 2012 gives them a vision of a Congress where Republicans would be fortunate to be riding a bicycle in to deliver sandwiches, let alone having a caucus with any influence on legislation.

With this realization, the Republicans are desperate to be able to smear Democrats with the mud that they are sinking in, and now they will accept nothing less than a plan that includes Democratic acceptance of, or better yet, Democratic proposals for, the hacking of holes in the New Deal social safety net. Such a coup would take that issue right out of the hands of Democrats in 2012, making the choice between Democrat and Republican little more than a cosmetic coin flip.

Obama was a fool to regurgitate that proposal onto the table as a reflex action. In doing so, he encouraged Republicans in their hostage holding of the nation's and the world's economy. Of course, this also exposes, once again, Obama's baseline blunder, which is his presupposition that Republicans, and especially Republicans in thrall to the TEA Parties, are even capable of bargaining in good faith. They are not; and one wonders how many times the President must have that concept demonstrated before he accepts it as fact.

This evening's address to Congress on the President's jobs program, and oh so much more, forces me to reconsider those events and those of this evening in a new light.

The President offered a mixed bag of stimulus proposals that are entirely unremarkable and seemingly selected for one characteristic that they hold in common, as the President belabored that characteristic, being that one or another or several Republicans had supported the measures in the past. This can be no surprise since most of the proposal is tax cuts or business subsidies.

Mentioned first, and apparently the crown jewel of his plan is the extension of the payroll tax cut, where he promised to cut the payroll tax in half. When this is coupled with his assertion that every single item in the jobs plan is paid for, this becomes a troubling thing. There is, after all, only one way to pay for a cut in the payroll tax, and though it went unspecified by the President, it is a reduction in the outlays supported by that payroll tax, which are, of course, Medicare and Social Security.

Then, further down the line, the President started to talk about additional measures involving budget cutting with no relation to the jobs program he had been talking about. Again he threw Medicare and Medicaid on the altar.

I had to ask myself why he would address those issues in this speech to propose ways to get people back to work, and the only answer I could come up with is that this is the quid pro quo. This is the enticement for Republicans to come along without kicking up too much dust. This was his offer to take the entitlements issue away from the Democratic Party in the 2012 election campaigns if the Republicans would go along with him now. This was his destruction of the likelihood of a Democratic congress in 2012 to help himself with maintaining a nominally Democratic White House in 2012.

He probably even believes that what he is doing is a good thing for the United States, as we watch ourselves sinking deeper into the nineteenth century.

 

I am a lifelong resident of the Chicago suburbs, with a several year hiatus to serve in the Navy when my Vietnam era draft notice turned up. I had been told that guys with last names like mine were among the preferred cannon fodder in the Army, so (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Steal $2.5 Trillion

The "Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme" Hoax

Wisconsin's Union Workers Have Always Paid 100% of the Cost of Their Benefits

Republican Bipartisanship, a Union of Both of Their Faces

Considering Edward Snowden

The Democratization of Energy, or God Bless the Child That's Got His Own

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

on MSNBC indicates that the sale was closed with t... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:22:43 PM
that has yet to swing its meat axe at Social Secur... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:35:18 AM
Sir, you give the treacherous corporate shill too ... by Robert James on Friday, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:04:34 PM