OpEdNews Op Eds

Are the Iranian Election Protests Another US Orchestrated 'Color Revolution'?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (393 fans)
- Advertisement -
A number of commentators have expressed their idealistic belief in the purity of Mousavi, Montazeri, and the westernized youth of Terhan.  The CIA destabilization plan, announced two years ago (see below) has somehow not contaminated unfolding events.

The claim is made that Ahmadinejad stole the election, because the outcome was declared too soon after the polls closed for all the votes to have been counted.  However,  Mousavi declared his victory several hours before the polls closed.  This is classic CIA destabilization designed to discredit a contrary outcome.  It forces an early declaration of the vote. The longer the time interval between the preemptive declaration of victory and the release of the vote tally, the longer Mousavi has to create the impression that the authorities are using the time to fix the vote.   It is amazing that people don’t see through this trick.

As for the grand ayatollah Montazeri’s charge that the election was stolen, he was the initial choice to succeed Khomeini, but lost out to the current Supreme Leader.  He sees in the protests an opportunity to settle the score with Khamenei.  Montazeri has the incentive to challenge the election whether or not he is being manipulated by the CIA, which has a successful history of manipulating disgruntled politicians.

There is a power struggle among the ayatollahs.  Many are aligned against Ahmadinejad because he accuses them of corruption, thus playing to the Iranian countryside where Iranians believe the ayatollahs' lifestyles indicate an excess of power and money.  In my opinion, Ahmadinejad's attack on the ayatollahs is opportunistic.  However, it does make it odd for his American detractors to say he is a conservative reactionary lined up with the ayatollahs.

- Advertisement -
Commenators are "explaining" the Iran elections based on their own illusions, delusions, emotions, and vested interests.  Whether or not the poll results predicting Ahmadinejad's win are sound, there is, so far, no evidence beyond surmise that the election was stolen.  However, there are credible reports that the CIA has been working for two years to destabilize the Iranian government.  

On May 23, 2007, Brian Ross and Richard Esposito reported on ABC News: “The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert “black” operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell ABC News.”

On May 27, 2007, the London Telegraph independently reported: “Mr. Bush has signed an official document endorsing CIA plans for a propaganda and disinformation campaign intended to destabilize, and eventually topple, the theocratic rule of the mullahs.”
- Advertisement -

A few days previously, the Telegraph reported on May 16, 2007, that Bush administration neocon warmonger John Bolton told the Telegraph that a US military attack on Iran would “be a ‘last option’ after economic sanctions and attempts to foment a popular revolution had failed.”

On June 29, 2008, Seymour Hersh reported in the New Yorker: “Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources. These operations, for which the President sought up to four hundred million dollars, were described in a Presidential Finding signed by Bush, and are designed to destabilize the country’s religious leadership.”

The protests in Tehran no doubt have many sincere participants.  The protests also have the hallmarks of the CIA orchestrated protests in Georgia and Ukraine.  
It requires total blindness not to see this.

Daniel McAdams has made some telling points.  http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/027782.html 
For example, neoconservative Kenneth Timmerman wrote the day before the election that “there’s talk of a ‘green revolution’ in Tehran.” How would Timmerman know that unless it was an orchestrated plan?  Why would there be a ‘green revolution’ prepared prior to the vote, especially if Mousavi and his supporters were as confident of victory as they claim?  This looks like definite evidence that the US is involved in the election protests. 

Timmerman goes on to write that “the National Endowment for Democracy has spent millions of dollars promoting ‘color’ revolutions . . . Some of that money appears to have made it into the hands of pro-Mousavi groups, who have ties to non-governmental organizations outside Iran that the National Endowment for Democracy funds.” Timmerman’s own neocon Foundation for Democracy is “a private, non-profit organization established in 1995 with grants from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), to promote democracy and internationally-recognized standards of human rights in Iran.”



Dr. Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration. He was associate editor and columnist with the Wall Street Journal, columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service. He is a contributing editor to Gerald Celente's Trends Journal. He has had numerous university appointments. His books, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is available (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Libya - The DC/NATO Agenda And The Next Great War

The Road to Armageddon

American Job Loss Is Permanent

A Story...The Last Whistleblower

Pakistan TV Report Contradicts US Claim of Bin Laden's Death


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
"Purity?"--I never said purity--or that ... by Allan Wayne on Saturday, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:52:27 AM
Thank you for supplying insightful information to ... by Nathan Nahm on Saturday, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:01:17 PM
We can be fairly sure the CIA would like to disobe... by Jason Paz on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:33:13 AM
Paul is interpreting events in Iran like someone t... by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:41:12 AM
Is Ahmadinejad actually a dictator? To many Irania... by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:28:48 AM
Sorry, Paul, I cannot vote for this: July 21, 200... by Allan Wayne on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:04:30 PM
Press TV has been reporting from Tehran, Iran toda... by Paul Sheldon Foote on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:26:05 PM
The MEK is the wolf slinking into the midst of the... by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 7:19:51 PM
[[RAJ]] “One of the most notorious executio... by Allan Wayne on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:59:52 PM
So are these the actions of local fanaticism, or C... by sometimes blinded on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 7:50:42 PM
Brought to you by President Ahmadinejad and Supre... by Allan Wayne on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:50:36 PM
what do Allan Wayne's propagandistic photos have t... by paul craig roberts on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:54:22 PM
 Dear Mr. Roberts Here we go again, now you are ... by Abbas Sadeghian, Ph.D. on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:59:54 PM