Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

All the "Best Ideas" on Health Care Reform, Not.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 2/23/10
Become a Fan
  (16 fans)

opednews.com

It boggles the mind that President Obama said he wanted all the "best ideas" put on the table (the basis for Thursday's televised bipartisan health care "summit") while having no proposal (and no intention) for a single payer Medicare type reform plan, or any kind of a "public option" (the compromise plan in the House bill brought forth when "single payer" was excised from the beginning of the health care debate) in his just released health care "reform" plan.

Yet this apparently is what Obama portrays as the "best ideas" for health care reform. Republicans naturally are apoplectic in their denunciation of the Obama plan, suggesting there is no change from the proposals already passed in the House and the Senate. To some degree they are correct, but they have been obstructionists and staunch opponents of any health care reform proposals from the beginning of the health care debate, so any objections they now offer ring hollow with hypocrisy. Republicans simply have nothing to offer now and never did have anything to offer to health care reform.

Again, what is truly flabbergasting is that Obama openly stated he wanted all the "best ideas" put on the table as the basis for this "summit". Say what you want; this is sleight of hand hypocrisy when there is no mention still of a single payer Medicare type proposal anywhere to be found in the present discussion.

The one proposal ("single payer") that would cover everyone, eliminate pre-existing conditions as a basis for denying health care coverage, provide real competition to the private health care insurers, and the one plan that would reduce health care costs to manageable and sustainable levels over time is NEVER MENTIONED.

The truly sad part in this political charade, in the end, is that the only way to enact anything that purports to be health care "reform" can only pass by the process of "reconciliation." This is a little-used legislative maneuver whereby only a simple majority in the Senate is required to vote up or down on a bill. It thus eliminates the need to overcome Senate filibuster rules requiring 60 votes to end a filibuster. Now with the Democrats (and the two Independents that caucus with them) having just 59 vote Senate majority, a filibuster by Republicans is all but assured, thus making "reconciliation" the only path the Democratic majority will have to enact anything on health care. In fact, "reconciliation" is virtually the only way any health care reform plan could ever be enacted.

Sen. Max Baucus (D-Montana), the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, was openly opposed from the beginning to any "single payer" plan, never inviting any representatives of this idea to his committee hearings. In fact, he had protesting doctors and nurses in audience attending those meetings physically removed when they verbally objected to their not being seated on the committee panels. Those hearings that did have representatives from the private health care industry seated then prominently near the Chairman.

Then there were the Senate "blue dog" Democrats, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, and Kent Conrad of North Dakota, who along with Independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut would never vote on any plan that would challenge the existing dominance of the private health care industry. All were beholden to private health care interests whose largesse funded their campaign chests. It was a no brainer from the outset; they would never go against the hand that feeds them.

So now, when "reconciliation" (which has not formally been acknowledged by Obama or the Democratic Congressional leadership) is (and ever was) the only vehicle available to Democrats to get health care "reform" enacted, "single payer" is still left out in the wilderness. The one plan that could truly be called transformational health care "reform" and benefit all the people in this country is not even included.

Its absence is a hard pill to swallow. It didn't have to be this way.

 

dglefc22733@aol.com

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

The Danger of an Israeli Attack on Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments