Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  1
1 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

A Texas judge definitely earns the epithet b*tch.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

opednews.com

WEIRD!

I’m a huge Al Pacino fan. I think I’ve seen just about every film he’s been in and have thoroughly enjoyed every performance, even if the film itself lacked. Just two evenings ago, on a lark, I ordered through Netflix And Justice For All. I saw it when it first came out those decades ago, but was in a ‘what the heck’ mood.

If you recall, one of the tragic absurdities raised in the film was the refusal of a stone-cold hearted judge to review evidence that exonerated a convicted fellow because the evidence was submitted three days beyond statutory discovery limits. Then, this morning I read the story of a Texas judge, Sharon Keller, who had ruled similarly concerning the Defense’s submission of DNA evidence that proved a condemned man did NOT commit the crime for which he was to be executed. (
And the judge’s reasoning? “We can’t give new trials to everyone who establishes, after conviction, that they might be innocent. We would have no finality in the criminal justice system, and finality is important.”

I wholeheartedly agree with Judge Keller in that “finality is important,” which, most especially in capital cases, is why exculpatory evidence must always be permitted to be submitted for review. “Oops — sorry” following the “finality” of the execution of an innocent person rings as just not completely satisfactory.

But now, by what term can you refer to this woman judge who continues to justify her judgment in the case as she does? Loathsome? Despicable? Reprehensible? Disgusting?

Tell you what: I absolutely hate the ‘B’ word. It most frequently degrades the user of it at least as much as it could ever the object of the highly derisive epithet. But, as it could have been me, or you, innocent, yet nonetheless facing “finality” because she is of the opinion that having it “is important,” lest the system be slowed down, if there is anyone who can fault me for calling Judge Sharon Keller a scum of the earth b*tch, please provide your argument.
    

 

An "Old Army Vet" and liberal, qua liberal, with a passion for open inquiry in a neverending quest for truth unpoisoned by religious superstitions. Per Voltaire: "He who can lead you to believe an absurdity can lead you to commit an atrocity."
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Texas Board of Education: America's Taliban.

Refusing The Call; Will selfish Seniors hand over the USA's future to China?

Merry Christmas-- Ho, Ho, Ho What the Hell

Today's McCarthyism. Will we Stand up Against it, or Stand Down?

ANYone who would vote for Sarah Palin is not an American

"The horror, the horror" -- Health Insurance CEOs Testify in Congress

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments