OpEdNews Op Eds

A Limbaugh-Ron Paulian Republic? The Youth Will Decide

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/2/09

Become a Fan
  (65 fans)

Having recently attended a youth leadership conference just over two weeks ago, I thought it worthwhile to take a look at some of the key speeches of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).

CPAC was dominated by youth and it is my belief that the youth (college students) who attended the conference were most energized by Rush Limbaugh’s and Ron Paul’s speech.

It’s not that others were not good (and by good I mean they made conservatives feel secure in their conservatism), but for the most part, if you combine those two speeches, you can find the platform, the policies, and the values that the Republicans will be using to “take this country back” now.

The platform, policies, and values spoken about in the two speeches will be what create the ethos for youth who wish to lead the conservative movement into the future.

First off, the conservative movement should be thought of as more of an occupation than a movement. As Limbaugh claims in his “Address to the Nation,” factions within the “movement” are “seeking power to dominate it and worst of all redefine it.” He says, “Conservatism is what it is and it is forever.” That means it is not something you can bend, shape, flake or form.

If the premise for organization in the “movement” is that there’s “nothing stale about freedom” and “nothing stale about liberty”, the organization is not a movement no matter how strong. The movement is a guard, a guard seeking to withstand blows to a fort that many find to be sound and strong and that others find to be a house of cards.

To Limbaugh and his followers, the worst threat to conservatism is the fact that the party right now might be arguing over the way forward and worse, the ideology that the party will uphold when vying for election.

Limbaugh and conservatives have what progressives need --- a lexicon of buzzwords that can ensnare anybody who listens for a moment. Instantly, no matter where you are in Limbaugh’s speech, you can understand that he is seeking to appeal to your emotions and he is seeking to appeal to you based on his character. (Whether the emotions he is appealing to or his character is wrong is irrelevant.)

From the speech, one can pick up terms and phrases which are packaged and ready for any talk around the water cooler at work: “drive-by media”, “everybody to succeed”, “for country to succeed, individuals must succeed”, “producers” and “earners” (to characterize the most wealthy in America), “not about revenue generation, about control”, “we are Americans”, “Democrats seek failure of America”, etc.

I suppose the speech Limbaugh gave could be distilled and summed up with the many phrases that CNN chose to run in the lower left-hand corner of the screen under Limbaugh’s name as Rush Limbaugh spoke.

“Conservatives we love people. Our beliefs are core, are from our heart. We cringe to watch capitalism insulted. Liberals have 2 sets of rules: one for them, one for everybody else. We want the country to succeed. Conservatives want every American to be the best. Where is the compromise of all this spending? Stimulus package relies on the complacency of the American people. We got out of the recession (80s) with tax cuts. No reason to punish the wealthy. Capitalism: there will be unequal outcomes. Democrats have one responsibility: follow the Constitution. We conservatives can take our country back. Conservatives we don’t hate anybody. Pres. Obama wants people in fear and angst. We need conservative leadership. We conservatives are not quitting, we are not giving up.”

The conservative guard, not the conservative movement, is prepared to hold strong. The guard is prepared to convince Americans that the government wants them to think they are being discriminated and are not being allowed to live their lives as they please. And, the guard is prepared to make you treat the most wealthy in America with the utmost respect even as they get bailed out to supposedly increase the flow of credit in America and instead use it on corporate outings to the beach and office redecorations.

As misguided as one may think Limbaugh is, Limbaugh has the capacity, ability, and power to take the Democrats and the growing progressive movement on and win. So long as Rahm Emanuel and other Democrats will engage him, there is that small possibility that his views (which are a grandiose populist manifestation of what many Americans are thinking in their gut) win.

Americans know conservatism. Americans do not know progressivism.

They can define conservatism. Can they define progressivism?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Kevin Gosztola is a writer and curator of Firedoglake's blog The Dissenter, a blog covering civil liberties in the age of technology. He is an editor for OpEdNews.com and a former intern and videographer for The Nation Magazine.And, he's the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Do Not Consent to Warrantless "Porno-Scanning" in Airports

Do They Put Lipstick on Pigs at the Funny Farm?

How Private Prison Corporations Hope Arizona's SB1070 Will Lead to Internment Camps for Illegals

Why the Battle Against TSA Groping and Body Scanners is Justified

Give Obama a Chance to Do What?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

After Joe McCarthy asked for William F. Buckley to... by Jason Paz on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:07:24 PM
Whatever people like myself once found admirable a... by Ed Encho on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:53:21 PM
What will become of the young people joining all t... by Kevin Gosztola on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:10:26 PM
And I really don't see much of an effort by th... by Ed Encho on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:35:01 PM
you asked when you said:"Americans know how t... by Steven Leser on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:12:16 PM
I might take ..... progressive, liberal, radical l... by richard on Monday, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:12:53 PM
I agree with you Richard, there is a great gap in ... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:04:25 AM
And I am afraid the intention of my article could ... by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:36:09 AM
"Being right is not enough. You have to do mo... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:09:10 AM