Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

A.I.G.- Who's Counting?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 3/8/09

Another thirty billion for A.I.G. How much is that now? Is anyone counting? 

 

Because no government in the world has the guts, or the wherewithal, to actually make good on those hundreds of billions in insurance against the worst investments in the history of the world, our government is trying to finesse the deck by doling out a fraction of the money (still a shockingly huge figure) in the hope that if we can keep this Titanic company afloat for awhile--the ship will eventually right itself as the economy recovers.

 

Ostensibly, this is being done because if A.I.G. does not pay-off the financial institutions holding these now worthless mortgage securities, those companies will become insolvent. This, it is argued, will in turn set off a string of banking failures causing the situation to become much worse than if we simply said good-bye to A.I.G. The Domino Theory, redux.

 

When one drills a little deeper, we are told that there may be some light at the end of the shaft. You see, as time goes by, many of these contracts will expire, and the exposure of A.I.G. will diminish. From being on the hook for, lets say, six hundred billions, they may be able to reduce that figure to a more manageable, and politically correct one of, let's say, one hundred to two hundred billions. That's a pill the politicians may be able to make us swallow.

 

I submit this today to the intelligent scrutiny of my friends at OpED, not because I am qualified to offer an opinion on this aspect of the bailout; but because it has raised questions in my mind which I do not fully comprehend as yet, and I am interested to see if anyone at this site can offer me a cogent answer.

 

What happens if this strategy succeeds, the contracts expire, and A.I.G. is off the hook?

Who is going to pay off on all those rotten certificates when they are no longer insured? (Hedged) If the idea is to prevent the banks from failing by enabling A.I.G. to cover their losses, how do we benefit from helping A.I.G. to crawl out from under those obligations? Aren't we just pushing off for a year or two the very failures we are now shelling out to prevent?  What am I missing here?

 

Because this situation has never happened before, nobody actually knows what they are doing. Every solution proposed is strictly theoretical. Needing a precision strike, we find ourselves not in the laboratories of NASA, but on the sands of Kitty Hawk with our fingers crossed.

 

What we have is a stall: Delaying tactics, a rearguard action. But when you are up in the air, as we are now, a stall, as the Wright Brothers learned, can be very dangerous. The money we have advanced A.I.G. may keep it aloft for awhile, but when it comes back to ground, who's going to rise up all those now clinging to its wings?

 

swantosez@gmail.com

 

shopkeeper 1976-2001

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

God, and the death of Atheism

Global Warming

Owls, Apple Pie and Socialism

Janet Napolitano- of size and security matters

Reagan Was Right, Stalin Was Wrong

Barack Obama and Michelle-separate no more

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

In the past 2 days it was widely reported that mos... by TomK on Sunday, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:08:20 PM
It's about hedge funds situated on tax-heaven vari... by Arktig Silver on Sunday, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:59:26 PM
This is a takedown not a breakdown...this is not a... by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:05:52 AM
They have been handed OUR money by the govt with n... by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:00:33 AM
Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000168 EndHTML:000000271... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:50:08 AM
If what you said is all what the banks did we won&... by TomK on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:38:18 PM
Kudos Dennis----for pointing out the flawed logic ... by Jeremy Haumann on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:08:05 PM
  “The sad thing is, our foreign policy... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:47:34 PM