Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (17 fans)

"I call'd the devil, and he came, And with wonder his form did I closely scan; He is not ugly, and is not lame, But really a handsome and charming man. A man in the prime of life is the devil, Obliging, a man of the world, and civil; A diplomatist too, well skill'd in debate, politics, yea, the devil I call'd and he came, to devour my soul, and the whole of humanity".                -  Heinrich Heine

On November 4, 2008, the world watched as Americans filed into polling booths to decide who should be the next occupant of the White House.  The excitement of the elections veiled the removal of the single most important choice:  the option to cancel the neoconservatives’ lease on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.   In the absence of that choice, “change” is continuity in the White House.  President Obama’s actions belie candidate Obama’s speeches and give meaning to Jacob Heilbrunn’s statement: "Don't look now, but neoconservatism is making a comeback-and not among the Republicans who have made it famous, but in the Democratic Party”.[1]  Mr. Obama’s cabinet has been carefully selected and appears ready to serve the neocon agenda. Worthy of mention are his Vice President Joseph Biden, and his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.  These two had the support of the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI); a self-described think-tank of the Democratic Leadership Council [2] – whose president, Will Marshall, released a volume of doctrine called With All Our Might: A Progressive Strategy for Defeating Jihadism and Defending Liberty.

This book was warmly received by none other than the Weekly Standard (May 22, 2006).   

The Weekly Standard was set up by Rupert Murdoch (recognized by the U.S. for his support of Israel and the Jewish Congress of New York voted him “Communication Man of the Year”) and it has run at a loss from its inception but Murdoch has kept it in circulation to enable such neocons as William Kristol to be given a platform on Fox as credible experts.  The pro-Iraq war candidate Hillary Clinton’s willingness to "obliterate" 70 million Iranians added to her credentials as Madame Secretary.  In her new role, she seems more keen that Cheney to continue on the path of destruction in order to serve Israel.  Other members include Chief of Staff and the son of an Israeli terrorist, Rahm Israel Emanuel, pro-Israel Dennis Ross, Richard Holbrooke, and the list goes on.

The agenda on September 13, 2001, while the country was recovering from the shock of 9/11, JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) already had a statement available as to how the U.S. should proceed.   Saddam’s fate, or rather Iraq’s fate, was already sealed.  They “recommended” that Iraq be invaded militarily.  President Bush obliged.  Among their other recommendations was the overturn of the “1995 CIA Directive limiting whom the United States can recruit to aid counterterrorism in an effort to boost our human intelligence”.  

It would appear that Mr. Bush had no qualms obliging.  



According to reports, the United States under the Bush Administration gave the terrorist organization Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK) ‘special persons status’ as pentagon officials planned to use the group against Iran, which they subsequently did.[3]   JINSA also recommended that America reevaluate its relations with Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf states – ‘with us, or with them’ as G.W. liked to say. Both the Arabs and Mr. Bush accommodated JINSA.  JINSA also suggested that America “take immediate steps to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil.”  In addition, its policy called for America to be involved in disputes far and wide for the unforeseen future not only in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also in Iran, Pakistan, Syria, Sudan, the Palestinian Authority, Libya, Algeria and eventually Saudi Arabia and Egypt’.[4]  

A tall order for one President.  George W. did his best to do it all.  Now it is Mr. Obama’s turn.  

While bombs continue to be dropped from Pakistani skies on innocent civilians, the Obama administration, with press and EU in tow, is once again ignoring the IAEA's report on Iran – which confirms that Iran is not a threat and it is working on its civilian nuclear program within the framework of the NPT – and instead, it is working to further a political agenda, that of Israel’s, enforcing and tightening sanctions – a prelude to a military confrontation with Iran.  

Once again America’s interests are being sacrificed.  

In lieu of creating jobs to feed the American people, Americans are being fed more lies to feed an imaginary threat. The cost to Americans for the unconditional support of Israel’s expansionist agenda has made America fiscally and morally bankrupt.  As a result of bowing to Israel’s pressures, March 2003 figures show that the US imposed sanctions on trade with Iran, Iraq, Libya and Syria, cost Americans more than 80,000-100,000 jobs a year.  “The reported aid to Israel, taking into the consideration the adjustment for inflation and the opportunity cost of capital at 3% brings the total to $247bn. Private Jewish remittances of around $30bn and net purchases by US parties of Israel bonds of some $10-14bn drain a further $40-50bn from the US economy.”  Ad hoc grants and special aid, such as the $1.2bn Israel received at the Wye Plantation meeting in 2000, are another important source of funds.[5]  

While JINSA has “recommended” that the U.S. take immediate steps to reduce dependence on foreign oil, the United States oil supply guarantee for Israel is estimated at potentially up to $3bn/month.  “Israel (through the U.S. Congress) has actually succeeded in reversing the tying of aid – U.S. firms are required to purchase from Israel about sixty cents worth of Israeli goods for every $1 which the U.S. provides in military grants.”[6] One has to wonder how Americans would truly feel about contributing to Israel on the basis of their “shared values” once they learn the truth.  

Not only has America’s future been mortgaged to finance the violation of international and humanitarian law, but since the beginning of the recession in 2007, 3.6 million jobs have been lost[7] - without a substantial effort towards peace, and without a silver lining on the horizon for our domestic woes, we continue to threaten Iran, a country that is not a threat to anyone, and continue our support of Israel – because 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is incapable of standing up to this small, but aggressive and violent nation.    

It is not our “shared values” that is provoking such a behavior; rather, it is our monetary values that are being shared – and our moral values that are being eroded.     

[1] Jacob Heilbrunn, "Neocons in the Democratic Party," Los Angeles Times, May 28, 2006.

[2] Tony Smith, A Pact with the Devil. Washington’s bid for world supremacy and the betrayal of the American promise.  Routledge 2007.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Talk to Iran without preconditions

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Soraya has lived and studied in-Iran, UK, France, and has obtained her Master's degree in Public Diplomacy from USC Annenberg and USC School for International Studies, Los Angeles.- She is an independent researcher, public speaker, radio (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Rude Awakening

Nukes and Temples

Abduction or Defection: The Case of Iran's Nuclear Scient

Samantha Power And The Age Of Genocide; Rwanda 1994 vs Gaza 2014

The Mushroom Effect

Blowback in Ferguson

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

After eight years of GW Bush's evil influence ... by Archie on Tuesday, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:22:04 AM
Archie: Thanks for the comment. I wish I could sha... by Soraya on Tuesday, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:50:54 AM
I fully agree with the author of this clear-eyed (... by Moji Agha on Tuesday, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:16:37 PM
   I too have to agree with all that the... by Ari on Wednesday, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:27:01 PM
Thank you for the superbly articulated insight. I ... by Soraya on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:21:52 AM