Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

BOEHNER'S BOGUS BUDGET

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 3/27/09
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

opednews.com

Responding to a direct challenge from President Obama on Tuesday evening, Republicans on Thursday unveiled their version of the FY 2010 budget of the United States government.  They did this with all the bravado of an aroused ant floating down the river on his back and shouting, “Open the drawbridge!” 

PajamasMedia’s Jennifer Rubin wrote that the Republican plan “goes some distance toward shooting down the Democrats’ spin that Republicans have ‘no ideas.’”   

No it doesn’t.  It goes some distance toward telling the American people that Republicans think they are dumb as hell, and gullible to boot.  The Republican “budget” is an insult and an affront to the American people.   

(Given that PajamasMedia’s last great idea was to hire Samuel Wurzelbacher (AKA Joe the Plumber AKA Sam the Fraud) as a war correspondent, that firm’s reputation as an arbiter of great ideas is far from firmly-established.) 

To be fair, the budget presentation itself represents one of the best ideas I have seen in a long time: it has no numbers.  No numbers, no historical discussion, no spending plans, no forecasts, no assumptions.  Just words, and a few pictures. 

In all my years of corporate budgeting I never until yesterday realized that the numbers were optional.  That would have made things ever so much easier.  In fact, considering that Republicans started their budget-sans-numbers on Tuesday night and finished it Thursday morning, I can only wonder, “What took you so long?” 

The Republicans’ budget, dubbed “The Republican Road to Recovery,” clocks in at a brief 19 pages.  Compared to the President’s 146-page budget behemoth, its pared-down size represents a considerable cost savings from the get-go. 

Well, it’s not quite 19 pages.  If you take out the front and back covers, the two-page letter from Minority Leader John Boehner and nine of his Worker Ants, the three title pages and nine-plus pages of criticism of the Democrats, you are left with 45 column-inches – about 2.6 pages – of “Republicans’ Solutions” to the nation’s problems. 

That’s not much.  Yet we all know that mere length is no measure of substance.  You can say quite a lot in 2.6 pages; after all, the Gettysburg Address was only 256 well-chosen words long.  So what is the substance of “The Republican Road to Recovery”?  What does it say? 

Limit budget growth 

It says the Republicans want to limit the federal budget from growing faster than a family budget.  Beyond glittering generalities like “enacting common-sense reforms and weeding out waste, fraud, and abuse,” it does not say how it will limit budget growth or even what index it will use to gauge that growth.  Nor does it say why equalizing family and federal budget growth is a good idea. 

They also plan to “devot(e) the entirety of any savings from reduced fighting to deficit reduction, rebuilding our military, and funding our commitment to our veterans.”  Boy, will they be surprised when they learn that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are funded entirely by debt.  There is no savings when you stop spending money you don’t have. 

Reform health care and entitlements 

The plan says Republicans want to provide universal access to health care and secure entitlements.  How?  By “provid(ing) tax incentives for millions of working families and small business owners to obtain access to coverage.”  Of course: tax cuts. 

That’s not all.  They will also reform the insurance industry, limit malpractice awards, and place a “catastrophic cap on out-of-pocket expenses” (which probably means a cap on expenses for catastrophic illnesses).  And they will allow states to “us(e) state dollars to supplement private health insurance coverage.”  In other words, they will pawn it off on the states to deal with. 

There’s bad news for some seniors “like Warren Buffett and George Soros.” They can expect “to pay $2 per day more for their prescription drug coverage.”  That should save us about $8 a day, after Bill and Melinda Gates qualify for Medicare Part D. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Rick Wise is an industrial psychologist and retired management consultant. For 15 years, he was managing director of ValueNet International, Inc. Before starting ValueNet, Rick was director, corporate training and, later, director, corporate (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HOW TO AVOID THE UNION

WILL GOP REBUT OBAMA'S EDUCATION SPEECH?

A Conservative's "12 Days of Christmas"

"I Don't Want to Pay for Somebody Else's Health Care"

Reconsidering Iraq: What If We Had Been Greeted as Liberators?

FairTax: Too Good To Be True?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments