Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
29 comments

View Ratings | Rate It

Republican Rage

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
OpEdNews Op Eds

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)


opednews.com

While it was reported, Mike Huckabee’s bizarre behavior at a shooting range recently, in which he pointed his gun in the direction of a group of reporters, received very little media attention. The Chicago Tribune blog, “The Swamp,” did a good job of describing just how reckless the behavior was. But all we heard on the corporate television media was about Huckabee’s “morbid sense of humor,” in which he joked that the birds he killed did not vote for him. As if that were not enough, the Swamp reported:

“Huckabee emerged happily from his hunt, three dead pheasants in tow ... Asked for a metaphor to describe the hunt, he replied, ‘Don't get in my way. This is what happens.’"

This behavior gives a glimpse of how Huckabee’s easy-going image is a façade. But this type of thinly veiled rage and hostility is, unfortunately, not limited to Mike Huckabee. It’s an important theme that runs through this year’s Republican campaign, and through much of neo-conservative rhetoric. Maybe it started when Ronald Reagan famously exclaimed, “I paid for this microphone!” or when he joked about bombing the Soviet Union.

Psychiatrist and author, Justin Frank, did a masterful job of describing similar, destructive tendencies in George W. Bush, in his book Bush on the Couch. Frank points to Bush’s traumatic childhood (e.g., the loss of his sister, with no outlet for grief), his sadistic tendencies (e.g., blowing up frogs, branding fraternity pledges), his history of drinking, and his alleged learning disability, to make a compelling explanation for Bush’s self-defeating and destructive presidency. But, again, this theme is not limited to Bush, even given all these pathologies. It is something that has grown, as traditional conservatism has given way to neo-conservatism and the Radical Right.

George Lakoff’s work, of course, casts a similar light on the Right’s punitive “strict father” approach to policy positions, creating a world in which unwanted pregnancies, poverty and STD’s are just reward for immoral behavior. But even Lakoff's "strict father" strikes me as mild, compared to the increasing hostility we hear from the Right.  The most recent displays of this Republican rage came from the Fox GOP debate, where Fred Thompson confused the Iranian Navy with suicide bombers, gleefully calling for them to realize their fantasy of meeting their 72 virgins - apparently enjoying his fantasy of a violent confrontation. Then, of course, there has been the steady drumbeat of Republican enthusiasm for torture and detention without charge, with Mitt Romney calling for the doubling of Guantanamo.

The most disturbing aspect of this mean streak, however, is not that Republicans and other neo-cons are not nice. It is the fact that the most satisfying policy result for this mindset, is not peace and prosperity, their espoused goals. Free-floating rage constantly searches for an excuse to be expressed. What better excuse than the perpetuation of war, chaos, and conflict? When you’re casting about for a fight - and trying to prove your manhood, to boot - escalating conflict can be so satisfying!

Progressives have long tried to explain to the electorate that the Bush policies have increased the risks of terrorism, not decreased them. Many progressives have - correctly - pointed to the “secondary gains” of increased government powers that come from keeping the American people in a constant state of fear. But perhaps there’s another semi-conscious motivation at play - keeping those juices of rage flowing.

 

http://www.amazon.com/Amy-Fried-Ph.D./e/B004QOOD04/ref=ntt_d

Amy Fried is the author of "Escaping Dick Cheney's Stomach." She received her Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior, and has been an advocate for church-state separation and other civil liberties issues. She writes on women's issues, media, veganism and (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
29 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Fear plus rage lead to demoralization. by John Hanks on Monday, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:51:23 PM
Escalating contempt into intellectual superiority by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:16:33 PM
Wow! Your sensitivity... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 2:54:01 AM
Your concern for my sensitivity moves me by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 8:36:08 AM
No Rage in Ron Paul's Philosophy by ronheri on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 7:12:30 AM
Only if one of two things occur.. by William Casino on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 9:43:42 AM
I agree, tho hard to remember he's nominally a Republican by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:31:24 AM
I'd be angry to by davy on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 7:22:53 AM
Deja Vu again... by waldopaper on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:35:41 AM
You are right by Barker on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:00:00 PM
I'm not quite following some of these comments by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:14:18 PM
It should be "misdirected rage" by Louis Park on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:22:43 PM
Rage of the cowards by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:49:00 PM
Twilight Zone, indeed... How rude - and so - I rage by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 1:44:00 PM
I have sympathy by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 2:14:06 PM
Agree to disagree by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 2:50:52 PM
framing or defaming by ladyguru on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 4:21:49 PM
What about Democrat RAGE? by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 6:58:30 PM
I mentioned Dems by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 7:15:46 PM
Response to Steve Scheetz by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 7:29:36 PM
Wow.... by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2008 at 9:12:55 AM
forgot to mention by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2008 at 9:21:19 AM
Waco by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2008 at 2:38:52 PM
No, there is 1 issue with Waco by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2008 at 6:29:23 PM
BTW by steve scheetz on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 9:50:46 AM
Another argument for another day by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 2:40:54 PM
OK, fine.. We can agree to disagree, on that... by steve scheetz on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 4:12:45 PM
Again... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 6:43:12 PM
So let me see if I have your point.... by steve scheetz on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 9:58:07 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2013, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum