Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
45 comments

Sci Tech

Sorcery For Scientists

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 10/21/11

Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

opednews.com

Sorcery for Scientists
by Lincoln Stoller, Tenger Research, LLC

Presented at the Memorial to Jerry Lettvin
Sept. 25, 2011 at Stata Hall, MIT, Cambridge, MA

Creative Commons License
Sorcery for Scientists by Lincoln Stoller is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Our scientific world view is rooted in the power of governments and corporations. A cosmology first institutionalized in schools and universities as an abstract study, with little more authority than the early doctors had in medicine, now dominates our world uncontested. Scientific arguments and formulas provide the guidance once read from chicken entrails by oracles and priests.

Science depends upon interaction because interaction precedes observation. The method of science: observe, predict, verify, and reproduce, presumes interaction with the environment. The differentiation between the observer and world he or she observes is a prerequisite for observation. Experience is a necessary prerequisite for anything.

Science proscribes the scope of experience acceptable to its consideration. Originally, so as not to intrude upon the domain of the church, science avoided astronomy, biology, and medicine. The range of scientifically allowable observables has greatly expanded, but the range of human experience has not.

Scientific thought requires the exclusion of a wide range of subjective human experience. Questions pertaining to social and personal consciousness are discouraged. When these phenomena are excluded from consideration, they are also excluded from recognition. Direct human experience has drifted ever further from the reach of our scientific society.

The modern scientist is a golum built from the mud of trainable skills and social attitudes, viewing the world according to the invocations written upon his or her forehead. Scientific thought does not potentate the scientist if the scientist is not his or her own master. And if they are not their own masters, then their power lies in the hands of those who control them.


Science will undermine itself not because it fails to realize its power or achieve its goals, but because it ignores what it does not see. When power inevitably turns to serve values other than the corporation and the state, scientists will be asked to see what they have overlooked. Those who cannot will be dealt with as the communists dealt with the monks: to return to the mud from which they were created. Systems that cannot bend will break.

We can avoid the destruction that results from a clash of values by reconnecting with a shared point of view, a common experience. We should return to magic because magic is the unfiltered, uncensored experience of the world. In order to see the world as more than what is illuminated under Nasrudin's street lamp -- recognizing only what fits our preconceptions -- we must swim in the dark sea of experience without expecting knowledge. We don't have to abandon reason, but we must experience a richer world. We must learn to experience what we can't understand.

Magic is everything that science is not. Magic is the unfiltered experience. Magic never asks "why," or "how," or "if." And where science excludes and reduces, magic strives to include everything and anything that makes a richer, more inclusive, disintegrated experience. The only rule is that you must come back, though you may return a changed person.

It is an historical lie that science overthrew magical thinking, as science is based on the primary magical experience. But whereas magic empowers the magician to define his or her own reality, science retracts this authority with the tether of method and the scrutiny of peers. Without this a scientists has no connection to the ineffable and no spiritual authority. To regain spiritual authority scientists must return to magic.

Practice sorcery as the root of unadulterated human experience. Strive to develop contact with everything that science denies, ignores, and excludes. Yes, magic involves spirits, visions and the supernatural. This is how our minds work when conflating the irreconcilable. This is how we deal with what we cannot understand. In this realm the questions of lucid science are destructive, blowing away the motes of experience and blinding us to the shadows of consciousness. Is magic real? Do not ask.

Our appreciation of the magic in the world equals our appreciation of the world. Only in magic can we find beauty. Only in magic can we become more valuable than the mud of our intellects.

Lincoln Stoller, September 2011

 

http://www.tengerresearch.com

Physicist, neurologist, neurofeedback practitioner, junior sorcerer, enthusiastic participant in extreme explorations involving mind and body. Believer in the idea that individuals find meaning in bettering and helping to evolve the ecologies in (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
45 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Imagination is more important than intellect. by lincoln stoller on Friday, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:14:44 AM
True science is magic by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:25:25 PM
the straw that broke the camel's back by Ned Lud on Saturday, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:45:56 AM
Magic; do you agree... by molly cruz on Sunday, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:46:06 PM
I just love quarters by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:15:07 PM
Most engineers, not to mention scientists, by GLloyd Rowsey on Sunday, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:06:30 PM
RE: mystically bent scientists by lincoln stoller on Sunday, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:50:38 PM
You're certainly right that science by GLloyd Rowsey on Monday, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:03:59 PM
try some acid by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:18:40 PM
Good magic and bad magic by Jim Arnold on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:31:48 AM
Have your read much about Sir Isaac Newton's by GLloyd Rowsey on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:37:10 AM
there were people who succeeded by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:35:28 PM
Excuse my mental blunder. by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:08:10 AM
grasping at straws by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:24:38 PM
Some definitions that may be helpful, by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:25:41 AM
not good definitions by lincoln stoller on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21:06 PM
behold... by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:29:04 PM
There you go, by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:01:04 PM
IT by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:51:36 AM
Yes, we must be wary of by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:58:50 PM
Science by Jim Arnold on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:19:36 PM
In fact, I agree. by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:09:45 PM
Science and not being able to say, scientifically, that by GLloyd Rowsey on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:10:25 PM
Popper by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:23:39 PM
Hume by Derryl Hermanutz on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:37:04 PM
Good points. by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:14:02 PM
understanding consciousness, perhaps there is none by lincoln stoller on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:46:23 AM
Science and consciousness by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:16:15 AM
consciousness and consciousness by Ned Lud on Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:45:45 PM
What is real... by Stefan Thiesen on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:24:04 AM
Consciousness by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:04:31 PM
re: consciousness by lincoln stoller on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:09:49 PM
Mechanism and magic by Jim Arnold on Monday, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:46:43 AM
re: mechanism and magic by lincoln stoller on Monday, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:39:20 AM
Causality in physics - and the nature of reality by Stefan Thiesen on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:04:15 AM
objects may be farther away than they appear by Ned Lud on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:51:01 AM
Well... by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:34:48 PM
Makes me feel itchy by Stefan Thiesen on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:06:41 AM
figuring it all out, Stefan by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:40:48 AM
The unholy alliance by Stefan Thiesen on Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:45:11 AM
those German (and other) dams by Ned Lud on Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:05:26 AM
One of your favorites... by Stefan Thiesen on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:33:04 AM
same difference by Ned Lud on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:43:00 AM
the internet at its best by Mikhail Lyubansky on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:32:20 AM
Imagination by Jim Arnold on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:28:58 AM