Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
19 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Progressives Fail because Progressivism is not Understood

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 7/19/10

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

opednews.com


Rosie the Riveter. An early Progressive by Steve Leser

Gallup has provided me a treasure of useful information this week. First was the empirical evidence that the Tea Parties and Republicans were one and the same. Most people had figured that out a long time ago, but it was nice to have it laid out empirically. Now, Gallup explains, unintentionally, why Progressives have a hard time getting Progressive values incorporated into legislation. Like with the Tea Party study, it validates something that to me was obvious. People do not understand what Progressivism is.

Gallup's study shows that 54% of Americans do not know whether the term "Progressive" describes their own views. If they cannot determine that, it means to me that they do not know what Progressivism is.

Even more curious is that 22% of the 12% of the population who self-identified as "Progressive" also self-identified as politically "Conservative". Something tells me that those people do not understand what the term "Progressive" means either so we can up the 54% to at least 66%. Two thirds of the American population do not know what "Progressive" means.

Many Progressives point to conspiracies or the elites or the powers that be or some combination when giving an explanation for why Progressives cannot get their agenda passed or even supported. This study better explains it. I have been saying for a long time that before Progressives attempt to get their ideas made into law, they have to first explain their ideas to the public and second, convince people that Progressive ideas are the right ones for the country. It makes sense, right? People are not going to support an agenda that they do not understand and has not been explained to them.

This opinion that I have had for a while is why I have placed myself in the "Pragmatic Progressive" category. Those of us in that category accept an incremental approach to Liberal and Progressive achievements in legislation because we know that there is not enough support for more comprehensive movement in that regard. We often clash with those who call themselves "Principled Progressives" who believe that we should go for broke on every piece of legislation and that failure on a go for broke approach is better than creeping incremental-ism.

Gallup's study, in my opinion, is game, set, match for Pragmatism, at least in the short term. It also means that Progressives have to go back to the drawing board and come up with a way to teach the country about Progressivism. I'm interested in hearing from fellow Progressives whether they agree or disagree with my assessment. I'm also curious as to whether the Principled Progressives believe that there is a way forward with go for broke legislation with only one in three Americans having any real understanding of Progressive values or their merits.

Link to the Gallup Study: http://www.gallup.com/poll/141218/Americans-Unsure-Progressive-Political-Label.aspx

 

http://www.ibtimes.com/blog/steven-leser_103/bio/

A political blogger for the International Business Times, Steve Leser is a hot national political pundit. He has appeared on MSNBC's Coundown with Keith Olbermann, Comedy Central's Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Russia Today's (RT) Crosstalk with (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Are you Progressive? Do you agree with my Opinions here? by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:13:56 AM
What is Progressive? by Nick Polimeni on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:26:48 AM
In short, a Progressive is ... by Tony Bartoletti on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:50:09 AM
Short and long answer by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:19:56 AM
Good Goals - Now as to Means by Tony Bartoletti on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:11:42 AM
decent standard of living by bruce powell on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:03:42 AM
Ends vs. Means by Maxwell on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:49:15 PM
Almost forgot - Most Telling! by Tony Bartoletti on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:53:00 AM
I cannot speak for all Progressives on that score by Steven Leser on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:24:22 AM
In General Agreement by Tony Bartoletti on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:42:18 AM
Progressive vs. Liberal by Maxwell on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:30:21 PM
Another Meaning by Maxwell on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:53:24 PM
Progressives Don't Try by ssg13565 on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:51:44 PM
Nice to see some reality by Sherwin Steffin on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:13:08 PM
Too many "Progressive" morons by stevor on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:21:53 PM
Mea Culpa! by Tony Bartoletti on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:33:01 AM
It's not our fault by Jim Prues on Monday, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:40:35 PM
Its really not rigged. I'm a case in point by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:49:52 PM
Defining "progressive" by Jim Arnold on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:59:49 AM