Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
34 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Pelosi Puts Rangel On The Table

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 6   Must Read 5   Supported 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 7/23/10

Become a Fan
  (239 fans)

opednews.com



Nancy Pelosi is putting a Democrat on the table for offenses profoundly less than the impeachable crimes Bush, Cheney and company perpetrated.

It's hard to tell what mental malfunction afflicts Pelosi and the rest of the Democratic leadership.

Oh, Rangel may deserve his due, but the idea that Rangel gets nailed, that hearings are on the table for him but not the much bigger fish who should have been-- that's just plain crazy... or stupid.

Democratic inability or unwillingness to prosecute Republicans appears to be in the Democrats' DNA.

It may be that they want to reserve the same criminal acts and policies for themselves. It may be because they are very afraid of Fox News.

Maybe it's the equal corruption of the duopoly that makes both parties cut from the same corporatist cloth.

Maybe its cowardice, which makes the Dems stand out or down. Who knows? The mice out-lived the velociraptors. Maybe cowardice is evolutionally adaptive.

But from my view, here, they're looking even worst than ever. Impeachment never should have been taken off the table. Hearings would have changed everything. Now, the Republicans know they don't have to worry about hearings on the table. Democrats save that for their own. Ptui! Pure idiocy.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and website architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), and publisher of Storycon.org, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Listen to over 150 of Rob's Podcast interviews here.

Mediate ranks Rob Kall among the top 180 print/online columnists, often ahead of NY Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post columnists.

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey and Positive Psychology. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. Watch me speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

 See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about Rob and OpEdNews.com, check out 
A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.

And Rob's quotes are here.

To watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, former Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video. 

Rob's radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also hosted a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
34 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Just Another Example by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:10:55 AM
Democrats by Timothy V. Gatto on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:29:52 AM
Snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. by Paul Kruger on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:40:04 AM
Rangel vrs. Bigger Republican Fish by Larry Snider on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:43:47 AM
But What About.... by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:55:25 AM
blowing people vs. blowing people up by bruce powell on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:47:19 AM
Queen Pelosi by Marlene Bakken on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:01:54 AM
And what about Carl Rove? by Paul Kruger on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:30:44 AM
Out, damn'd spot by Marika on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:04:55 PM
Hmm! by Miriam Callaghan on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:46:02 PM
Honored Veteran vs AWOL Brat by Lance Ciepiela on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:45:52 PM
Pelosi by Aurora on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:50:53 PM
Why her role during that era was significant by Aurora on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:10:33 PM
Thank you, Mr. Kall! by Nathan Nahm on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:17:49 PM
Pelosi & Rangel by Kellia Ramares on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:35:55 PM
Cowardly Because They are Corrupt by Carol Davidek-Waller on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:42:54 PM
A matter of constitutional exegesis by Recce1 on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:18:00 PM
Actually by Dennis Kaiser on Saturday, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:42:24 AM
Good understanding by Evelyn Pringle on Saturday, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:11:31 PM
Think again by Recce1 on Monday, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:56:45 AM
What a display of incredulity, part 1 of 3 by Recce1 on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:42:08 PM
What a display of incredulity, part 2 of 3 by Recce1 on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:45:09 PM
What a display of incredulity, part 3 of 3 by Recce1 on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:47:14 PM
Our privatized "government". by Richard Posner on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:15:15 PM
The Democrats Fatal Flaws by Eugene Elander on Saturday, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:05:50 AM
Where do you draw the line? by Recce1 on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:16:41 PM
Fatal Flaws in Your Arguments by Eugene Elander on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 4:03:28 PM
"not your distortions?" by Recce1 on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:54:42 PM
Ad Hominem arguments are the worst! by Eugene Elander on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:12:09 PM
Abstruse was used quite correctly by Recce1 on Monday, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:32:26 AM
War crimes by Richard Pietrasz on Saturday, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:18:45 AM
Rangel by paul craig roberts on Saturday, Jul 24, 2010 at 5:52:01 PM
Rangel by paul craig roberts on Saturday, Jul 24, 2010 at 5:52:17 PM
Mr. Roberts again hits the nail squarely ;) by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:29:12 AM