Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
20 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama Administration Careening Towards Disaster (and Taking the Country With It)

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 2   Inspiring 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 3/22/09

Become a Fan
  (50 fans)

opednews.com

By Dave Lindorff

Six months after the failed Bush administration effort to "rescue" the US financial system, and after two months of failed efforts by his own new administration, at an expense to the American public of several trillion dollars and counting, the Obama administration is announcing plans to blow another $1 trillion in a massive taxpayer giveaway to investors who will be subsidized in an effort to get them to buy the so-called toxic assets on the books of the nation's biggest banks.

The problem with this plan is fundamental:  These zombie banks will not start lending again no matter how much money we lavish on them.

It doesn't matter how good the balance sheets of the banks are. Good companies, and even individuals and families with good credit, are simply not borrowing. As I wrote last month in the magazine Treasury and Risk, the problem isn't that banks are too weak to lend (though the zombie banks certainly are), it's that the strong banks don't want to throw money at bad borrowers.

It is the nature of economic downturns like this current one that companies and ordinary families don't borrow, but rather cut back on their spending and try to reduce their debt, the better to ride out the hard times. It is only the companies that are in trouble, like General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, that are looking for loans, and no bank is going to want to lend to them regardless of how much money the government pumps in. (And if the public decides that it is in the national interest to prop up such companies, it is much more efficient for the government to lend to them directly:  Direct loans will make more money available to the end-borrower, and at a lower interest rate.)

What this means is that all the Obama administration, the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve are doing by buying the toxic assets off the books of banks like Citigroup, Bank America or Wells Fargo is giving a taxpayer handout to those banks' investors and bondholders--the very people who enabled those companies to invest in the corrupt credit default swaps and other shady derivatives in the first place.

What should happen? Citibank, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and the other financial institutions that made bad bets on these structured financial instruments, should be allowed to fail, taking with them the investors who played this dirty game, and the managers who decided to gamble instead of run conservative banking operations.

The government would protect the assets of depositors in those failed banks, which would be sold to healthier, better run banks, making those banks much stronger and better capitalized in the process--and thus ready to start lending as needed. This is standard operating procedure for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Note that this process would mean no crisis in the economy, since the ability to access credit would not be crimped in the least by the failure of some of the country's larger banks. It would, in fact, probably be enhanced.

The toxic assets would be eliminated through the bankruptcies, and the government--and taxpayers--would be $1 trillion less in the red.

Why isn't the Obama administration doing this? Because Obama has put his trust in the advice of men--Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Chief Economic Advisor Larry Summers, and, informally, former Clinton Treasurer Robert Rubin, all linked to the investment bank Goldman Sachs, which was also the corporate home of Bush Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. The same Goldman Sachs which was given $10 billion in Troubled Assets Relief Program funds directly, and which then snagged another $13 billion in TARP funds in secret, which was laundered through the now-government-owned insurance company AIG.

It should be clear at this point that the Goldman cabal burrowed deep inside the Washington apparatus is working not to rescue the US economy, but rather to ensure the survival and enrichment of the big banking establishment, and of course Goldman Sachs.

What we are witnessing in the policies of the Obama administration is not the creative experimentation of a modern-day Franklin Roosevelt, but rather the greatest heist in the history of mankind, as trillions of dollars in public funds are shifted from taxpayers' pockets into the hands of the very banks and bankers and bank investors who brought us this financial debacle.

Instead of decrying the bonus payments to AIG executives, the American public should be demanding the indictment of Paulson, Summers, Geithner and Co. for IGL: Incomprehensibly Grand Larceny.

Instead of trying to rescue the nation's giant banks, we should be demanding that they be shattered into little harmless pieces.

Come to think of it, maybe it's time for a run on the banks--not because your money is not safe at Chase or Citibank or B of A, but because these institutions need to be killed off for the good of the nation.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thanks Dave for reminding me.......... by Ernest on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:13:34 AM
If this is "the greatest heist in history" & the Obama admin by Richard Mynick on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:33:00 AM
RICHARD by WML on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:30:40 PM
Oh yes, I've been reading WSWS steadily for 8 years already. by Richard Mynick on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:26:18 PM
YES by WML on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:28:02 PM
Obama is a neocon by Perry Logan on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:23:19 AM
Hopes by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:44:00 PM
Americans Need to ACT, not listen to Lies of Robber Barons by boomerang on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:45:47 AM
lindorf article reeks of common sense by liberalsrock on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:22:28 AM
That's Why I Voted for Nadar. by Starla Immak on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:28:24 AM
That's Why He Voted for Nader by The Candid Blogger on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:13:04 AM
yep starla by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:56:09 PM
And no where is there mention of the elephant in the room .. by Mr M on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:16:47 AM
Dirty Laundry by Munich on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:00:38 PM
dirty laundry by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:54:51 PM
Geitner by Chris Hamark on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:14:42 PM
it's too late to by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:48:24 PM
Coup d' Grace by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:34:07 PM
COUNT ME IN by Marcus Aurealeus on Sunday, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:19:22 AM
Re: dirty laundry by Munich on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:19:46 PM