Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
39 comments

Must Read 9   Well Said 8   Valuable 6  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 11/9/12

It's the Interest, Stupid! Why Bankers Rule the World

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
OpEdNews Op Eds

Become a Fan
  (120 fans)


opednews.com


Money that works for the .001% by legalschnauzer.blogspot.com

In the 2012 edition of Occupy Money released last week, Professor Margrit Kennedy writes that a stunning 35% to 40% of everything we buy goes to interest.  This interest goes to bankers, financiers, and bondholders, who take a 35% to 40% cut of our GDP.   That helps explain how wealth is systematically transferred from Main Street to Wall Street.  The rich get progressively richer at the expense of the poor, not just because of "Wall Street greed" but because of the inexorable mathematics of our private banking system.   

This hidden tribute to the banks will come as a surprise to most people, who think that if they pay their credit card bills on time and don't take out loans, they aren't paying interest.  This, says Dr. Kennedy, is not true.  Tradesmen, suppliers, wholesalers and retailers all along the chain of production rely on credit to pay their bills.  They must pay for labor and materials before they have a product to sell and before the end buyer pays for the product 90 days later.  Each supplier in the chain adds interest to its production costs, which are passed on to the ultimate consumer.  Dr. Kennedy cites interest charges ranging from 1 2% for garbage collection, to 38% for drinking water, to 77% for rent in public housing in her native Germany.

Her figures are drawn from the research of economist Helmut Creutz, writing in German and interpreting Bundesbank publications.  They apply to the expenditures of German households for everyday goods and services in 2006; but s imilar figures are seen in financial sector profits in the United States, where they composed a whopping 40% of U.S. business profits in 2006.  That was five times the 7% made by the banking sector in 1980.  Bank assets, financial profits, interest, and debt have all been growing exponentially. 

                                             
U.S. Bank Assets by http://www.oftwominds.com/blogsept12/cui-bono-Fed9-12.html.

Adapted from http://www.oftwominds.com/blogsept12/cui-bono-Fed9-12.html.

Exponential growth in financial sector profits has occurred at the expense of the non-financial sectors, where incomes have at best grown linearly.


Household Income by http://www.oftwominds.com/blogsept12/cui-bono-Fed9-12.html.

http://lanekenworthy.net/2010/07/20/the-best-inequality-graph-updated/

By 2010, 1% of the population owned 42% of financial wealth, while 80% of the population owned only 5% percent of financial wealth.  Dr. Kennedy observes that the bottom 80% pay the hidden interest charges that the top 10% collect, making interest a strongly regressive tax that the poor pay to the rich. 

Exponential growth is unsustainable.  In nature, sustainable growth progresses in a logarithmic curve that grows increasingly more slowly until it levels off (the red line in the first chart above).  Exponential growth does the reverse: it begins slowly and increases over time, until the curve shoots up vertically. Exponential growth is seen in parasites, cancers . . . and compound interest.  When the parasite runs out of its food source, the growth curve suddenly collapses.     

People generally assume that if they pay their bills on time, they aren't paying compound interest; but again, this isn't true.  Compound interest is baked into the formula for most mortgages, which compose 80% of U.S. loans.  And if credit cards aren't paid within the one-month grace period, interest charges are compounded daily.

Even if you pay within the grace period, you are paying 2% to 3% for the use of the card, since merchants pass their merchant fees on to the consumer.  Debit cards, which are the equivalent of writing checks, also involve fees.  Visa-MasterCard and the banks at both ends of these interchange transactions charge an average fee of 44 cents per transaction--though the cost to them is about four cents.  

How to Recapture the Interest: Own the Bank

The implications of all this are stunning.  If we had a financial system that returned the interest collected from the public directly to the public, 35% could be lopped off the price of everything we buy.  That means we could buy three items for the current price of two, and that our paychecks could go 50% farther than they go today. 

Direct reimbursement to the people is a hard system to work out, but there is a way we could collectively recover the interest paid to banks.  We could do it by turning the banks into public utilities and their profits into public assets.  Profits would return to the public, either reducing taxes or increasing the availability of public services and infrastructure.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Ellen Brown is an attorney, president of the Public Banking Institute, and author of 11 books. Her websites are http://WebofDebt.com, http://EllenBrown.com, and http://PublicBankingInstitute.org. In her latest book, "Web of Debt: The Shocking (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
39 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Marx was right by B. Ross Ashley on Friday, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:41:18 PM
indeed by Ellen Brown on Friday, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:42:55 PM
Sorry but by BFalcon on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:27:49 PM
I think a couple hundred million by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:15:56 PM
That Was Top-Down Communism by Timothy Gatto on Sunday, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:36:31 PM
There is only one way to make by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:19:42 PM
The elites are winning by Robert James on Monday, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:39:54 PM
Replace Tim Geitner by intotheabyss on Friday, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:43:25 PM
ha ha, thanks! by Ellen Brown on Friday, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:35:28 PM
don't laugh Ellen... by James Tennier on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:35:03 AM
If elected . . . by Ellen Brown on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:16:58 PM
That is a start. by James Tennier on Sunday, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:22:35 PM
Why not? Hah. by Robert James on Monday, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:42:19 PM
No!, well maybe... by James Tennier on Tuesday, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:21:47 AM
I second the nomination! by Scott Baker on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:49:46 AM
The Federal Alternative to Owning the Bank by Robert Bostick on Friday, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:45:29 PM
coin seigniorage by Ellen Brown on Friday, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:43:38 PM
I'm thinking... by James Tennier on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:47:20 AM
Coins are not the only form of debt-free money available by Scott Baker on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:03:18 PM
Simpler solution by Arend Rietkerk on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 6:15:30 PM
"has to" by Robert James on Monday, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:48:05 PM
Congress prefers to borrow from The Fed and pay interest by Lance Ciepiela on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:12:42 AM
Really? by James Tennier on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:48:29 AM
yes by Sarah Joames on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:55:28 PM
The obvious, but highly unlikely conclusion by Robert James on Monday, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:58:10 PM
good ideas by David Roche on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:06:39 PM
utterly stupid by Sarah Joames on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:49:20 PM
If you are under the illusion by intotheabyss on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:35:09 PM
riddled with errors and stupidity by Sarah Joames on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:54:30 PM
reply to supidity riddled with errors by Howard Switzer on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:28:39 PM
You seem to reject the role of human ingenuity by Mark Oetting on Sunday, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:17:22 AM
Alas by Robert James on Monday, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:00:53 PM
Fed is dead? by Kenn Spaqce on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:42:41 PM
unearned by Ernie Messerschmidt on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:49:39 PM
turning it around by Howard Switzer on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:36:14 PM
I like it by Ernie Messerschmidt on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 6:42:00 PM
Stupid? by roger erickson on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:09:48 PM
But remember - by Keith Pope on Sunday, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:28:30 AM
Ellen Brown for president's Economic Council by Scott Baker on Tuesday, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:33:56 PM