Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
20 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Income Distribution: Does It Really Matter

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 3/11/09
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

opednews.com

The value of the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Industry first exceeded that of the Manufacturing Industry in 1990.  It is the largest contributing segment of our Gross Domestic Product.  As our economy increasingly has become more service oriented and less dependent upon manufacturing, the value attributed to labor has decreased and that of capital has increased.  So too has the value of the minimum wage decreased; in 2007 dollars it peaked in 1968 at $9.47 per hour.  Households have had to depend upon two worker incomes, longer working hours, and increased debt just to stay even.  With polygamy continuing illegal, they have no means of assisting the economy out of the current recession. Much has been written about the increasingly concentrated wealth amongst the very-very wealthy, the top 0.1 and 1.0 percent.  But what about everybody else?  How was our 2007 national income distributed or as some would say, mal-distributed?  How has it changed in the last three decades?  Why does it even matter?

For purposes of simplicity, lets say ten dollars is distributed to ten households.  Who gets what? Well, two of the households, the top earners, will have $4.97 leaving $5.03 for the other eight households. The next two top earning households will receive $2.34, just under one-half of those "gated community" top earning households.  Between these top four earning households, they have $7.31 of each $10.00 of national income leaving $2.69 for the remaining six households. The middle two households will split $1.48 between them leaving $1.21 for the lowest four earning households.  The mean 2007 income for these two households was $50 thousand; none earned more than $62 thousand.

Of the remaining $1.21, the next lower earning two households received $0.87 and the lowest earning two households received $0.34.
    

Since 1977, the top quintile, the top 20 percent earning households have increased their share of the American income pie from 44.0 percent to 49.7 percent  The remaining eight households have all experienced a smaller share.  The 4th quintile off 1.3 percent, the middle off the most, down 2.1 percent. The 2nd quintile off 1.5 percent and the lowest quintile off 0.8 perceent.  For more than 30 years labor's share of national income has declined while that of capital has increased.

Until or unless the low-to middle-class families in this country regain the ability to, and actually do, achieve significantly increased real income, our current economic quagmire will look better than any we may find in the future.  Nothing in the current stimulus package(s) increases the value of non-executive labor upon which the vast majority depend.  Does this not portend to a long and deepening recession if not a depression?

 

A retired MBA, I am a former corporate ideologue, former 3rd party advocate and current curmudgeon. While a continued supporter of a 3rd party, I have concluded their efficacy cannot be demonstrated until our form of Government is changed to (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
ID by kay solomon on Wednesday, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:56:54 PM
Want More Info Like This? by PrMaine on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:20:20 AM
Move over Fox! by Steve Hanken on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:31:38 AM
It's not a pie by roy lutz on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:49:37 AM
Spoken from the heart of greed... by PeterJ on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:09:32 AM
Who's greedy? by roy lutz on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:03:32 AM
A believer in collecting personal wealth ... by PeterJ on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:28:57 PM
The Source of Wealth by Harold Hellickson on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:54:51 AM
Abraham Lincoln adds to this by Harold Hellickson on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:51:18 PM
I agree with Lincoln. by roy lutz on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:12:53 PM
It's possible,, by PeterJ on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:01:27 PM
Economic collapse may be more likely by Harold Hellickson on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:44:06 PM
Point Well Made.... by PeterJ on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:53:17 AM
This is oinkage... by William Whitten on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:43:25 AM
Who's trying? by PeterJ on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:50:28 PM
Roy's agrument by Harold Hellickson on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:07:29 PM
Rational? by roy lutz on Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:14:40 PM
Bullwinkles Trick Top Hat by William Whitten on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:13:30 AM
Reducing Inequality is of Great Importance! by Mark Goldes on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:24:35 PM
Scammed by William Whitten on Saturday, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:49:05 PM