Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
8 comments

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 1/24/13

Female Fodder for the War Machine, Ban to be Lifted on Women in Combat

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
OpEdNews Op Eds
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)


opednews.com

Cap't Sara Rodriguez of the 101st Airborne Division walks through the woods during the expert field medical badge testing at Fort Campbell, KY. on May 9, 2012 (Kirstin M. Hall/AP)

Well there it was in this morning's newspaper headline, "Women to get combat role." [i]

Sometime today, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta will announce the lifting of the ban on women in combat. A Defense official characterized it as "opening up hundreds of thousands of additional front-line jobs to them".

Implementation is to be done as "quickly as possible" according to a military official but it will take some 3 years before all the services can fully implement the combat role for women.

Apparently Joint Chiefs Chairman Martin E. Dempsey wrote in a January 9 th letter to Panetta stating, "The time has come to rescind the direct combat exclusion rule for women and to eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to service."

The question is, why now? Did a light bulb go off in Dempsey's head and instinctively he thought this was the time to lift the ban? Please.

Nothing the Pentagon does is without planning and fore thought, and it's unimaginable that President Obama was kept out of the loop in deciding to announce this at this time.

The military presents this new policy as giving women "equal opportunity". For sure, women in the military have long objected to being excluded from combat roles, which has been an impediment to their being promoted.

  Of course there are no qualms from here in giving women equal opportunity. It's long overdue and correct.

But again why is this being announced now? My sense is lifting the ban on women in combat now is simply a numbers game.  

It has nothing to do with women's ability to fly combat aircraft or carry a rifle as a combat infantry soldier.

Could it be there's a dearth of men available for combat? "Stop-Loss" demands have forced many male combat veterans to be sent back to war zones time and again even after previously serving 3 and 4 tours.

Maybe military recruiters are having difficulty filling their recruitment quotas with able bodied men?

Use of the National Guard in overseas combat has strained their ranks.

So"the simple solution is, lift the ban on women being in combat roles.   

Next Page  1  |  2

 

dglefc22733@aol.com

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Liberalism defined... by Ross Brummet on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:55:19 PM
Your Mother Wears Combat Boots No Longer an Insult by Dryden Wonne on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:30:51 PM
Let those who choose to be fodder, be fodder... by David Brookbank on Friday, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:42:03 AM
All who participate by Richard Pietrasz on Friday, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:44:36 PM
No ban on women in combat in the first place by Richard Pietrasz on Friday, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:49:37 PM
The "real" story by Dave Lefcourt on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:44:10 AM
Not Nurenburg by Richard Pietrasz on Sunday, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:51:23 AM
No problem... by Bill Johnson on Saturday, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:28:21 AM