Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
32 comments

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 3/14/12

Even Small Amounts of Any Animal-Source Foods Are Bad for You

By (about the author)     Permalink
Sci Tech
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)


opednews.com



A major study that has just been published in the Archives of Internal Medicine shows that eating a lot of red meat increases the risk of death, especially the risk of death from heart attacks and strokes and cancer. I'm glad that this message is getting out. However, I wish that people were told the whole story: Nutrition researchers have known since 1994 that eating even small amounts of any animal-based food increases the risk of death. There doesn't seem to be any safe level of intake. We know that from the China-Cornell-Oxford Project, a massive study that was undertaken in China starting in the 1970s. That study included some populations that were eating extremely small amounts of animal-based foods. It found that there didn't seem to be any "safe" level of intake of meat, eggs, fish, and dairy foods. 

Of course, people don't want to hear that they can't eat any meat. They want to hear that a little bit is okay. They especially want to hear that the foods they like can be part of a "healthy, balanced diet." Many people especially want to hear that they should dine on expensive seafood instead of eating cheap hot dogs. In reality, however, the scientific evidence has been showing for decades that eating any animal-source food poses a needless risk.

The USDA urges people to eat animal-based foods, even though the scientific evidence clearly shows that that those foods are the major underlying causes of our major causes of death and disability. By doing so, the USDA is violating federal law. According to U.S. federal law (7 USC Sec. 5341 [2011]), the Secretaries of Agriculture and Health and Human Services are required to issue Dietary Guidelines for Americans at least every 5 years. These guidelines are intended for the general public and "shall be promoted by each federal agency in carrying out any federal food, nutrition, or health program." The information and guidelines in each report "shall be based on the preponderance of the scientific and medical knowledge which is current at the time the report is prepared." In other words, it's a violation of federal law for the USDA to urge us to eat food that scientific research has shown is bad for us.

The 2010 guidelines urge Americans to eat lots of "protein foods." Yet nutrition scientists have known since the early 20th century that human protein requirements are so low that they are met automatically if people eat enough unrefined starches and vegetables to get enough calories. The nutritionists who designed European food rationing systems during World War I knew that fact. In 1917, the famous British nutrition researcher Sir William Maddock Bayliss wrote, "Take care of the calories and the protein will take care of itself." In Denmark, Dr. Mikkel Hindhede designed an almost exclusively plant-based rationing system to prevent starvation during World War I. As a result, Denmark enjoyed the lowest death rate in its history. The people of the United States deserve to know these things. It's a matter of life and death.

 

http://www.nottrivial.blogspot.com

Laurie has worked as a medical editor and writer for many years. She is the author of the upcoming book Not Trivial: How Studying the Traditional Liberal Arts Can Set You Free, which is being published by Freedom of Speech Publishing.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
32 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

novel science by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:58:09 AM
Not funny by Suzana Megles on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:47:07 PM
Did you also read a story by BFalcon on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:46:37 PM
Why gorillas have a shorter lifespan than humans do by Laurie Endicott Thomas on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:53:44 AM
We can frame it either way by BFalcon on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:36:22 PM
Thank you for your excellent article. by Nathan Nahm on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:34:50 PM
Evolution, Vitamin B-12 and being politically correct by rich andrews on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:49:42 PM
Thank you Mr. Andrews, for a small dose of reason. by Paul Repstock on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:13:17 PM
Canine teeth and B12 by Laurie Endicott Thomas on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:08:18 AM
and the "nice, clean supplements" are made from what, again? by rich andrews on Friday, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:04:37 AM
B12 comes from bacteria by Laurie Endicott Thomas on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:04:52 PM
No one lives forever by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:35:07 AM
Do I want to live a long life? by Suzana Megles on Saturday, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:20:38 AM
Organic vs. factory farm meat by Scott Baker on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:06:06 AM
The meat in rural china in the 1970s was probably organic by Laurie Endicott Thomas on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:15:08 AM
How sad by Suzana Megles on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:20:40 AM
oh suzana: by Ned Lud on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:58:56 AM
I'm a science writer, Ned by Laurie Endicott Thomas on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:26:48 AM
Thanx Ned. by Suzana Megles on Saturday, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:33:47 AM
the china syndrome by Ned Lud on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:26:51 AM
Cited article does not reach the author's conclusions by John Moffett on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:30:21 AM
You Have to Read the LIterature as a Whole by Laurie Endicott Thomas on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:38:19 AM
I hear the "Everybody's got to die sometime... by Shankari Kali on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:39:09 AM
BEARS by rich andrews on Friday, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:57:55 AM
A great post on Alter Net by Suzana Megles on Saturday, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:44:15 PM
Not so fast. There's more to the story. by E.J.N. on Saturday, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:57:38 PM
Killing life with reverence???? by Suzana Megles on Saturday, Mar 17, 2012 at 4:49:10 PM
I understand your point of view, and even agree in part. by E.J.N. on Sunday, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:17:54 PM
And there's a whole lot more to these complex issues. by E.J.N. on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:27:58 PM
Just a simple reply by Suzana Megles on Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:43:08 AM
Is Meat Really Bad? by Janet Loughrey on Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:22:54 PM
The Inuit are not immune to heart disease by Laurie Endicott Thomas on Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:50:51 PM