Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
18 comments

NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers Unexplainable

Quicklink submitted by Mark E. Smith     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It


At www.prisonplanet.com

The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have come down.

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.prisonplanet.com


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
"The National Institute for Standards and Tec... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:48:51 AM
"A 10,000 page scientific study only offers ... by Mark E. Smith on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:12:55 AM
The WTC buildings were full of asbestos, and had t... by Mark E. Smith on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:26:32 AM
With regard to any of the 911 conspiracy theories ... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:22:55 PM
There are two competing theories about how the bui... by Mark E. Smith on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:40:00 PM
Tom Murphy, so you really think Occam's razor ... by gravity32 on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:04:59 PM
I'm saying that the NIST evaluation, as detailed i... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:56:41 PM
In what way? Had they gone into Iraq and Afghanist... by Mark E. Smith on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:09:02 PM
Tom, there is a common thread of course - find it ... by gravity32 on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:25:06 PM
Tom the people in the organizations that carry out... by Mark E. Smith on Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:38:48 PM
Thank you, Gravity32. I hadn't seen those link... by Mark E. Smith on Thursday, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:02:19 AM
Tom you make a big issue of the scope of the NIST ... by gravity32 on Thursday, Oct 18, 2007 at 6:58:49 AM
A comment on the incompetence (or not) issue befor... by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Oct 18, 2007 at 9:39:07 AM
You are welcome to the last word Tom... by gravity32 on Thursday, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:08:07 AM
On second thoughts I should comment on the above.&... by gravity32 on Friday, Oct 19, 2007 at 1:41:13 AM
I appreciate the effort of compelling me to see th... by Tom Murphy on Friday, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:12:37 PM
It seems you are really interested in the facts so... by gravity32 on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 6:04:18 AM
"It started with a downward acceleration very... by Tom Murphy on Monday, Oct 22, 2007 at 3:39:19 PM