Lifespan in U.S. Weapons Much Longer Than Thought - Bush doesn't need RRW

Quicklink submitted by Amanda Lang     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)


At www.washingtonpost.com

Results of the studies could affect the Bush administration's plans for building a new generation of nuclear weapons under the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program. A major reason for going to a new nuclear warhead was the belief that highly radioactive plutonium would degrade so much within 45 years that it could affect the reliability of currently deployed and stockpiled nuclear weapons made in the 60s.

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.washingtonpost.com

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments