Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

Video clip from Bleifuss/Freeman's new book: "Was the 2004 election stolen?"

Quicklink submitted by Joan Brunwasser     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (70 fans)


At www.alternet.org

Americans shouldn't have to presume a fair count. The mainstream media has, to all effects and purposes, established (to borrow the phrase of the great American novelist, Joseph Heller) a Catch-22 for election investigation. No investigation without proof-but then, what proof can be had without investigation? The American public has a right to be skeptical about whether there was a fair count in the last presidential election, and to have their skepticism proven wrong by overwhelming evidence. In any functioning democracy, this test would consistently be met without stirring controversy.

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.alternet.org


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments