Conyers v. Bush

Become a Fan
  (70 fans)
Quicklink submitted by Joan Brunwasser     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It


'First it was ignoring the Geneva Conventions,' said Conyers. 'Then it was the abuse of Presidential signing statements. Now our government is arguing that it can pick and choose which laws to ultimately enact, regardless of clear Constitutional procedures requiring bicameralism before presentment to the President.'

Read the rest of the story HERE:




The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments