How Old are the First Planets?

Quicklink submitted by Kyle McDermott     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)


These heavy elements -- 'metals' in astronomer-speak -- don't just materialize out of nothing. They are the products of fusion power within stars, subsequently spewed out across the cosmos on the blast waves of supernovae, lacing the interstellar medium with the raw ingredients for planets. Is it possible that rocky planets could have formed around other stars much earlier? Are we the new kids on the block by comparison? Until recently, we didn't think so. The prevailing wisdom had been that the magic of stellar alchemy didn't produce enough useful 'star-stuff' to build terrestrial worlds until at least six or seven billion years after the Big Bang. Regardless, one thing is becoming clear: that sufficient raw materials for building terrestrial planets were available very soon after the Big Bang, raising the possibility that there could be life in the Universe far older than we.

Read the rest of the story HERE:


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -



The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
[[VID31]] This animation shows how a black hole m... by Kyle McDermott on Friday, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:47:10 PM