Two Federal Judges Suggest 20th Century Is Unconstitutional

Quicklink submitted by Amanda Lang     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 4/16/12

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)


At thinkprogress.org

For more than 2 years, TP has tracked 'tentherism,' a radical misreading of the Constitution which claims that pretty much everything the federal government does is unconstitutional. Tenther lawmakers -- who include members of Congress, senators, govs and at least one sitting Supreme Court justice -- have claimed that child labor laws, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, clean air laws and the federal highway system all violate the Constitution. Even tentherism has a limit, however. While tenthers would all but eliminate our natl leaders' ability to solve natl problems, they concede that state govts are still free to serve their citizens. Which is why a recent concurring opinion signed by US Court of Appeals judges David Sentelle and Janice Rogers Brown is so disturbing. Under Sentelle and Brown's vision, any attempt to protect workers, investors or consumers from unscrupulous...

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At thinkprogress.org


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Wouldn't returning all power to the States essenti... by ORAXX on Monday, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:10:09 PM
I thought rolling back birth control and Roe v Wad... by Amanda Lang on Monday, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:45:24 PM
that the tenthers contort themselves to avoid can ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:00:11 AM