Share on Google Plus
  2
Share on Twitter
  1
Share on Facebook
  1
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

School Reform in Newark With a New Teachers' Contract - NYTimes.com

Quicklink submitted by Susan Lee Schwartz     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It


At www.nytimes.com

Supporting and rewarding the best., as the Newark negotiation, in this article sells as the answer, is blarney... not that this is somehow a bad idea,! It's the issue of 'criteria' that makes this bogus. The entire national conversation about evaluation is a deception which avoids pointing the finger at the real culprits who do not support the classroom teacher. Four of the New Standards criteria for learning were for THE ADMINISTRATION!Learning cannot take place without this, but then have you heard BOO about the real NEW STANDARDS? Teachers are forced to follow anti-learning curricula, and mandates that make teaching and learning impossible! Has anyone writing about education actually read the research? Standardized tests were never part of it, and yet, this has never been debunked, and the conversation was turned from evaluating student to evaluation od teachers!

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.nytimes.com


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments