Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

Can Neuroscience Challenge Roe V. Wade?

Quicklink submitted by Amanda Lang     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)


At opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com

When I was asked this summer to serve as an expert witness in an appellate case that some think could lead to the next Supreme Court test of Roe v. Wade, I was surprised. Rick Hearn is the attorney representing an Idaho woman who was arrested for allegedly inducing her own abortion using mifepristone and misoprostol -- two F.D.A.-approved drugs, also known as RU-486 -- and for obtaining the drugs from another state over the Internet. While the case against Ms. McCormack has been dropped for lack of evidence, Mr. Hearn is pursuing a related suit against an Idaho statute, the 'Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act,' and others like it that cite neuroscientific findings of pain sentience on the part of fetuses as a basis for prohibiting abortions even prior to viability. So why not call an actual neuroscientist as an expert witness instead of a scholar of the humanities?

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments