Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

Attacks on Disclosure - For Some Citizens United Did Not Go Far Enough In Allowing Secret Donations

Quicklink submitted by Amanda Lang     Permalink
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)


At www.nytimes.com


Candidate Mitt Hearts Citizens United
(image by EN2008 for Flickr)

A major premise of the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling is that prompt disclosure of campaign contributions can allow voters to judge whether candidates are ' 'in the pocket' of so-called money interests.' But the huge amount of cash funneled through 'super PACs' by corporations, unions and wealthy individuals -- whose identities are often hidden behind shell entities -- makes a mockery of this notion. Now many lawsuits across the country are seeking to gut even limited disclosure laws in states like Maine, Florida and West Virginia. James Bopp Jr., who initiated the Citizens United case, is a prime mover behind cases attacking disclosure. Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston rightly upheld the disclosure requirement of Maine's campaign finance law against a challenge by Mr. Bopp and others...

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.nytimes.com


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments