![]() |
|
September 15, 2008 at 05:17:40 Permalink Courts are stacked: Is there hope for the Andover criminal trial of Bush + Co? Diary Entry by Kathryn Smith (about the author) |
|
Cognitive distortions are based on a grain of truth, but also throw off the message we give ourselves from the real truth. Let's correct the cognitive distortions about the courts being stacked, without denying the reality either, and get to work. Thanks! :::::::: But here's where I want to challenge us all to think a bit. It's a cognitive distortion in our own heads to think that "all" judges are against the American cause. Okay, let's assume I am wrong. Let's assume that it's the other way around: 25% should give us hope. Because it's easy for lawyers to declare a mistrial and request a different judge. They know what they are doing. To those of you who are inclined to respond to this article with a blanket statement, that "more than" 75% of the judges are against the American way, let me ask you: Where do you get those figures? Please offer us fact-based information before asking us to believe something that will only hold down the masses with discouragement. I am, in effect, suggesting that we challenge the cognitive distortions in our own brains. I think that's very important, given how depressed (and de-motivated) we are as a people. Put it this way: If the courts were really so stacked as to not leave even one single judge in favor of upholding the US Constitution, then the ACLU and Center for Constitutional Rights would have folded long ago and they also could not have won the rulings in court striking down parts of the Patriot act and the nixing of Habeas Corpus in the Military Commissions Act. It's just that simple. WATCH OUT FOR COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS IN THE BRAIN! THEY ONLY HOLD DOWN PROACTIVITY! PROACTIVITY IS WHAT WE NEED NOW, MORE THAN WE EVER DID BEFORE! HOLD THE HOPE IN MIND! Many Republicans are also tired of the Congressional Republican tricks and are turning against their own party. We've seen it right here on Opednews, Republican civilians posting their apologies and their outrage with what Congressional Republicans are doing. And, even voting against their Republican candidates. Don't we all think many judges are of the same bent? Don't we all think they want to shed that negative image tagged to them? That the Andover lawschool summoned attorneys with the Center for Constitutional Rights, who sought to jail Rumsfeld with international governments' cooperation, and the famed Vince Bugliosi, gives me a lot of faith in the outcome of this project. I think there is a lot of hope here. The Center for Constitutional Rights has a very successful track record in court, obtaining the very first judicial ruling which struck down the Patriot Act as unconstitutional. And if we civilians succeed in condemning Bush, Cheney and Administrative higher-ups to jail, then perhaps future presidents and their "right hands" will re-think before doing such criminal acts as we have seen in this 8-year-long nightmare which threatens go on on forever. Maybe there is the light of hope that we civilians will effect the system of checks and balances with such trials, even if Congress won't. Let's keep the focus on ourselves, where the hope is, instead of on those who will never do anything, who feed our despair---and our collective inertia. Hope feeds proactivity: We civilians are the hope! Let's give ample coverage with our pens to this meeting in Andover Mass and be part of the solution! Future generations and our own emotional well-being in the next few years, hinges around this matter. Let's get to work! Thank you all for your help.
Of course the courts are stacked. We all know that. Of course people are discouraged and afraid that the Andover, Massachusetts lawschool's proposed criminal trial of Bush, Cheney and Administrative officials just won't work because of that.
Try half?
Try 40%?
35%?
That leaves a lot of those judges who are for the american way instead of against it.
Even if 75% of the judges are corrupted---and maybe they are----then that also leaves 25% who are for us.
Let me also point out that many judges are angry at the Administration for disarming them of their power to put a "check" on runaway government power, via unconstitutional post-911 legislation: My guess is that could make them *more* likely to rule in our favor instead of *less* likely.
It's all conjecture and we can't play Merlyn regarding the contents inside other peoples' brains. My own guess is that the variables above make many of them (even if not all of them) MORE likely to rule in favor of condemning Bush and Cheney and Administrative officials, not less likely. Think about it.
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Please write the editors about the Andover criminal trial: Spread the light of hope to our depressed nation!
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
This quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism:
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 2 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Diary?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |