Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
June 4, 2008 at 11:17:18     

My article about the libertarian philosophy was rejected WHY?

Diary Entry by Ferdinand (about the author)

 

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg


Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It

Must have struck a nerve?

::::::::

I recently wrote an article discussing how the libertarian philosophy has been attacked repeatedly on this and many other sites by many different groups of people. The article was not published for one reason: I claim Bob Barr to be less radical and more mainstream than Ron Paul. The administrator informed me that I misrepresented the Libertarian Party by this statement. It is disappointing to see educated (apparently, who knows) people mistake "libertarian" with Libertarian. One is a philosophy and the other is a party trying to obtain political power. There is a huge difference. I mean what I said and I said what I mean. And I am not wrong.

I try not to push my ideas onto anyone, but explain why libertarians feel the way they do. I encourage cooperation with progressives to achieve mutual goals. But someone did not like this very much.

Judge for yourself. Here is the article in full:

--------------

The Libertarian Scare

Democrats and Republicans, Progressives and Neoconservatives, Socialists and Statists. All have been growing increasingly concerned over the popularity of the libertarian philosophy.

Although increasing in numbers due to Ron Paul's success, libertarians are still only a small percentage of the population. The Libertarian Party candidate, Bob Barr, will not win the general election. He is more mainstream and less radical than Ron Paul, which could gain him a significant amount of votes, but he will not inspire a great many people to action like Ron Paul did for this very same reason.

So who will be voting for Bob Barr? He recently stated that he does not believe he will be taking anyone away from the McCain camp. McCain has the Neoconservative vote locked up, especially with Clinton out of the race. Will disillusioned Democrats decide to turn their backs on Obama and vote for the man who led the impeachment of their last president? Probably not too many. Barr will likely be getting votes from LP regulars, conservative Republicans, Independents, and those who do not usually affiliate with political parties.

If libertarians are not going to be taking over the country any time soon and will not play a significant part in this upcoming election, why are so many people worried?

I believe it is because the libertarian philosophy is attractive. The philosophy transcends party politics. With a country facing imminent collapse, such a radical idea becomes an intriguing option. Have not both parties been responsible for bringing us to the brink of destruction? Why should government increase in size and scope every year? Why must our civil liberties be destroyed? Why not obey the Constitution? Cannot change be affected at the local level most effectively? Does the United States really need to police the world? Would people not be more prosperous if their labor was not taxed by the federal government to pay for boondoggles? Why is our money backed by nothing? Why does the Federal Reserve debase our currency?

These are hard questions to answer. This had led many people to put their faith in themselves, friends, families, free markets, God, and their fellow man. Often misunderstood, libertarians are not simply greedy or lacking compassion. They see the problems that arise from unrestrained government in collusion with big business and honestly consider their philosophy as being the most efficient and intelligent way for restore peace and prosperity for all.

Libertarians understand that the state has made many obligations to its citizens. The only way these obligations could actually be met would be by dramatically decreasing spending, withdrawing troops from around the world, and by living within our means. Eventually it would be great to see these programs phased out as people can best be cared for at the community level, but this is not an immediate goal or a pressing concern. Do not be mistaken by propaganda and lies, libertarians do not want to put people out on the streets.

Let us not fear each other. I suggest we all try to put aside our differences, learn from one another, and cooperate to achieve our similar goals. We want to see Neoconservatives (Democrat and Republican alike) thrown out of power, our country returned to prosperity, and our international reputation restored.

By working together, we can return our country to greatness.

-------

How dare I represent the Libertarian Party in such a way! Well, to be frank, the Libertarian Party is misrepresenting libertarians. Although I find Bob Barr more agreeable than McCain and Obama, I just do not believe in him. He is not a reluctant candidate like Ron Paul, but rather an opportunist riding his coat-tails.

Word of advice to OpEdNews. Stop alienating your writers. It will eventually come back to haunt you.

 

Though he is of noble blood, Ferdinand has no desire to fight or rule. He would prefer to explore, to ponder, to love, and to smell the flowers. Nevertheless, Ferdinand is a bull and he has horns.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Book Recommendations for "Cooperation Fear Government"
UN Action Against Terrorism: Fighting Fear (The United Nations: Global Leadership)
by Heather Docalavich

$21.95
Lowest New Price $17.88

Number of pages: 88
Publisher: Mason Crest Publishers

Fear of Persecution: Global Human Rights, International Law, and Human Well-Being
by Anthony J. Marsella

$80.00
Lowest New Price $70.28

Number of pages: 304
Publisher: Lexington Books

View All Book Recommendations

 

Share this page: (what's this?)

Facebook      Add This Diary to Mr Wong!      DIGG THIS           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Ferdy by John R Moffett on Wednesday, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:24:52 PM
Let's talk about roads by Ferdinand on Wednesday, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:55:13 PM
if there's a case of water utilities being privatized by Better World Order on Thursday, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:13:06 AM
H2O by Ferdinand on Thursday, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:07:17 PM
thanks for your thoughtful reply by Better World Order on Thursday, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:52:40 PM
Let us talk about states by Ferdinand on Wednesday, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:14:09 PM
fallacy? by Dean Striker on Wednesday, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:15:57 PM
Pressing on.. by Ferdinand on Wednesday, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:19:52 PM
Progressives have not progressed by Jeanette Doney on Wednesday, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:33:38 PM
I knew there was something missing around here.. by Ferdinand on Wednesday, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:28:38 PM
Here Are My Thoughts on Libertarianism by Richard Volaar on Wednesday, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:41:30 PM
Excellent perspective (I wish it was an article) by Ferdinand on Thursday, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:38:03 AM
LOL by Amanda Lang on Thursday, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:32:08 PM
An invitation... by Amanda Lang on Thursday, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:34:41 PM
Richard Volaar by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Friday, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:04:51 PM
Patriot Act Shill Drug Warrior is the new libertarian hero? by Martin Hill on Sunday, Jun 8, 2008 at 4:06:06 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Diary? Post Comment


 

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum