![]() |
|
March 7, 2008 at 16:08:10 Permalink Misogyny by Any Other Name: No, Charlotte Allen, Women Aren't Dim; It's Really Just You Diary Entry by Tumerica (about the author) |
|
Sexism is still alive and well, thanks to writers like Charlotte "kind of dim" Allen. But, Allen has also defended the likes of former Harvard President Lawrence Summers. :::::::: Charlotte Allen, a contributing writer to such well-read publications as the Washington Post, the Dallas News, The Atlantic, The Los Angeles Times, and others, finds herself in the middle of a conflagration caused by her own writing. The topic? Her analysis of female Obamaniacs and how the seeming mental dimness of groupie behavior leads her to conclude women, “. . . could shriek and swoon and gossip and read chick lit to our hearts' content and not mind the fact that way down deep, we are . . . kind of dim.” (From the Washington Post article published Sunday, Mar. 3, entitled, “We Scream, We Swoon. How Dumb Can We Get?”) Choose any bad behavior, for instance, violent crimes. 84% of violent crimes are committed by men in the U.S.. Does that make all men guilty of innate violent tendencies? Yet Ms. Allen gets off on condemning the “shriek, swoon, and gossip” we women are wont to do, as she puts it, and that makes us all “kind of dim.” I guess there will always be idiots with access to the Internet who are willing to broadcast their mind-numbingly ludicrous opinions, but what's up with the editorial staff of the Washington Post? Why is sexism pronounced by women any less sexist than that pronounced by the Imuses and Summers of the world? I've read way too many published sexist comments directed against Senator Hillary Clinton to have any delusions about sexism being a dying form of bigotry, but this Allen article stoops to a new nadir.
Allen has published articles defending the sexist comments of the previous Harvard University President, Lawrence Summers, when he referred to what he presumed to be mathematical deficiencies in the minds of the female sex by way of explaining why so few women choose academia in the sciences. Summers later stepped down over his views. Allen, however, continues her thinly veiled sexism against her own. One wonders if Ms. Allen would also have defended the comments of, say, Don Imus for his sexist-racist double-whammy when he referred to the stellar athletes of Rutgers women’s basketball team as “nappy-headed hos.”
If you would like to let Charlotte Allen know how you feel about her sexist espousals, here is her e-mail address: charfleur@aol.com. If you would like to let her editors at the Washington Post know, e-mail outlook@washpost.com and write “Smarter Than You Think” as the subject.
Tumerica is a freelance nonfiction writer whose essays on social injustice have appeared in area newspapers. She regularly blogs on progressive political issues, food, and beauty. She writes book reviews of non-fiction books, as well as writing (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 2 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Diary?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |