Refresh   Tag(s): Crashes; Events; Government; Murder; Murder; Open Access; Pentagon; QUANTUM; Reality; Rules; (more...) Science; Story; Wake; Will  (less...)
Add to My Group

February 13, 2008 at 09:09:13     Permalink 9/11 An Open Challenge Diary Entry by arlen custer (about the author)

SAVE AS FAVORITE VIEW FAVORITES

View Ratings | Rate It

An open challenge to any and all believers of the official myth.

::::::::

 

As time drags on from the terror of 9/11, I grow wary of all the subterfuge from both sides of the issue. The truthers need to stop hypothesizing about who did what or how it was done and start single mindedly addressing the blatant reality of what did happen. For the believers of the official myth. They just need to wake up and explain how the facts I will present, could occur.

What I intend to do here is just deal with the most basic and blatant evidence.  Because that is the only thing that is relevant at this time. A true investigation is for finding out who did what and how they did it. The only ground rules I would ask are; No quantum physics. It is a theoretical science and we have physical science that we know to be true under the conditions that exist on this planet. And no explanations that ignore any of the facts presented.

 

In the official explanation of the towers collapse, the only force acting on them to bring them to the ground was gravity.

1. How could the towers fall straight down upon them selves, in the path of most resistance, at the same rate as a brick falling through the air? 

It is well known at what temperature kerosene  burns. It is also known that in airliner crashes more than ¾ of the fuel is burned off on impact. It is also well known at what temperature aluminum melts, and at what temperature it vaporizes. There are also many examples of airliner crashes, some at full speed into mountains, that have left large debris fields.

 2. How could an airliner crash into the thick concrete wall of the pentagon and not leave a large debris field?  

The next question about the crash in PA is nearly the same as above.

3. How could an airliner crash into the ground and not leave a large debris field?  There are certainly a great many other questions about these events, that the official explanation does not answer. However these three question alone, should be enough for anyone with a functioning mind, to question the official story. The only reason I can see for not questioning it, is that you don’t see the relevance in your life of our government being willing the murder us if it so desires.

 

Just a plain working person that is sick of the lies and our ego driven complacency about those lies.

 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Diary?

---

 

 

 

Tell a Friend:

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews Powered by Populum