![]() |
|
November 2, 2009 at 19:43:56 Permalink Obama's crucial decisions on Afghanistan --- and ‘Beyond Afghanistan' --- on EMPIRE. Diary Entry by Alan MacDonald (about the author) |
|
Has any president, has any leader, ever had so many critical decisions to make at one time, and so many issues to speak to the American people about? :::::::: All the
media talk is about the crucial decision that Obama faces in Afghanistan.
Whether to give in to the generals, and allow the war to expand, after
years of 40,000 to 70,000 US troops fighting and training Afghanis, to over a
100.000 troops (or more) with a massive weapons build-up.
But while
the intense speculation regarding Obama's decision about expanding the
Afghanistan War, the designed-to-be-expanded ‘Global War on Terrorism', into a
likely AfPak war is on everyone's front-burner, Obama has a multiplicity of
other foreign policy decisions, and an even more vast array of domestic economic
and social goals he desperately wants to pursue in the U.S.
Has any
president, has any leader, ever had so many critical decisions to make at one
time, and so many issues to speak to the American people about –-- and build
their confidence that he can speak with them openly and address their combined problems?
Has any leader
ever had such a problem in dealing with critical domestic issues that mean so
much to him, and yet had such risks to his plans and hopes caused by a foreign
war he would rather not have to speak about?
Like
Obama, Rev. Martin Luther King was confronted with a similar monumental
decision about whether to speak-out against the imperialist war ‘abroad', that
was grinding up the working-class sons of both black and white Americans, or to
continue focusing on his most heart-felt problem ‘at home' of inequality and racism's
tyranny against young blacks.
For more
than a year, Rev. King kept his focus on the racial battle at home, and would
not be detoured by addressing the combination of multiple issues that would
inevitably spring from taking-on the crimes of imperialist foreign war,
domestic racism, and the ‘class-warfare' that linked these crimes of Empire.
Finally,
on April 4th, 1967, and at the Riverside Church in New York City, Dr. King decided that it was “A Time to Break Silence” not only about Vietnam,
but Beyond Vietnam, and to speak the truth about the nature of Empire and the
class-war that Empire always uses to maintain its unfair, unjust, and
un-democratic control over the indivisible political-economics of power both
‘abroad' and ‘at home'.
Hopefully, Obama will reach the same monumental decision as Dr. King –
and even more hopefully, average Americans of all colors will respond to a
seminal outing of Empire by recognizing their common humanity, their
common-wealth in country, their common ‘public interest' in democracy (against
the ‘private interest' of Empire), and by treating this 21st century
messenger and leader against Empire and for democracy differently than Dr. King
was treated.
I hope
that Obama is benefiting, in his time of decision, from taking the time to
re-read King's Riverside speech:
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm
King noted,
“The war in Vietnam
is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit” And today, hopefully, Obama will take note that, “The war in _______ is but a symptom of a far
deeper malady within the American spirit” King continued: “It is with such activity in mind that the words of the late
John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us. Five years ago he said, "Those who
make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution
inevitable." Increasingly, by choice or by accident, this is the role our
nation has taken, the role of those who make peaceful revolution impossible by
refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense
profits of overseas investments. I am convinced that if we are to get on the
right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical
revolution of values. We must rapidly begin...we must rapidly begin the shift
from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and
computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important
than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism
are incapable of being conquered.” And I hope that Obama recognizes that those “giant triplets
of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism” are EMPIRE. Finally, King concludes with, “If we will make the right
choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a
beautiful symphony of brotherhood.” And I hope that Obama, in preparing to make his choice,
recognizes that the multiplicity of those “jangling discords of our world”,
those pressing problems ‘abroad' and ‘at home' are but the uniform fingerprints
of one thing ---- EMPIRE. Alan MacDonald Sanford, Maine
Former computer/communications marketing and product strategist. Currently teaching part time in retirement.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| No comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Diary?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |