Refresh   Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
October 29, 2009 at 10:28:26     

Goofy Attack on Iran Predictions on OEN

Diary Entry by Steven Leser (about the author)

 

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg


Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It

We've seen them now for over three years. Is anyone accountable for their wrong predictions? Is anyone looking at this empirically?

::::::::

We started seeing these here on OEN in 2006 with predictions that the US was "just about" to attack Iran.

Most recently, Paul Craig Roberts made the suggestion that because the US and Israel engaged in recent war games, that necessarily meant an attack on Iran was imminent. Let's look at a few facts:

1. Iranian nuclear facilities are well dispersed and hardened. The chance of conventional air attacks destroying them all is almost zero. We can also dispense with the idea of a pre-emptive nuclear strike. The international consequences would be too severe.

2. Given #1 above, onlya land invasion would do the job. There are only a few countries in the world with an army large enough to occupy Iran. If any of them were toprepare for such anundertaking, it would take months of positioning the appropriate troops and supplies. We would see this coming 6-8 months in advance at a minimum. This is what we saw with the invasion of Iraq. There was about eight months of troop deployments to the middle east that were hardly secret. We all saw what was happening.


3. In addition to #2 above, we would have to see monetary appropriations for the troop deployments and potential conflict. You would see bills in congress for this. I am sure that would stir up debate.

4. You would also see senior members of the administration making a case for such a war to the international community and, of course, to the country. Are we seeing ANY of that? No, of course not.

With no money and no troops and equipment in place and no other strategy that leads to success, the burden is on people who write such crazy articles to justify their assertions. The burden is also on them to issue mea culpas when they are proven incorrect. If you purport to be a journalist, you need to be accountable, particularly if you are attempting to create fear of some impending event.

I personally think that people who write these kinds of articles to create fearwith zero empirical evidence to justify their assertions and then don't write mea culpas or some other retractions when proven wrongought not to be allowed to write for OEN. Let them write for someplace that has no standards.

 

OEN editor Steve Leser is a hot national political pundit. He has appeared on MSNBC's Coundown with Keith Olbermann and Comedy Central's Daily Show with Jon Stewart. But, Leser is most known for his work as commentator and the progressive (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Book Recommendations for "Iran War Journalism"
Closing a bold paper: journalists lose a political tug-of-war in Tehran.: An article from: Columbia Journalism Review
by Maura Casey

$5.95

Number of pages: 2
Publisher: Columbia University, Graduate School of Journalism

Political Cartoons in the Middle East: Cultural Representations in the Middle East (Princeton series on the Middle East)

$39.95
Lowest New Price $34.50

Number of pages: 154
Publisher: Markus Wiener Publishers

View All Book Recommendations

 

Share this page: (what's this?)

Facebook      Add This Diary to Mr Wong!      DIGG THIS           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Whether ther is is or is not an attack is immaterial. by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:22:13 PM

 

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum