Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

US Supreme Court Rules for Corporations over public interest; against free speech

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The US Supreme Court is showing it's new corporate logo, and it's against the public interest and free speech.

::::::::

In three rulings yesterday the US Supreme Court showed off its new Roberts-Alito-Thomas-Scalia brand logo. The news was not good for the public interest.

In summary the court ruled that corporate developers are free to go about development without regard to the broader public interest concerning environmental issues: causing irreparable harm to our precariously balanced, fragile ecosystem is not in the general public's interest; unfettered construction and development is.

The new US Supreme Court branding was also evident in another decision favoring corporate special interests over the public interest: approval of the further corruption and pollution of the country's political process by unrestrained corporate "issue" advertising dollars. Apparently corporations have greater standing influencing political campaigns than do individual citizens: I guess the court's new quadrivium hasn't read De Tocqueville's Democracy in America....

Finally, the US Supreme Corp's, I mean Court's, muscle was further flexed in a case involving free speech rights of students: "Bong hits for Jesus" may be patently offensive, even ludicrous prima facie. But don't protest too loudly, the US Supreme Court may hear....

 

http://www.blogger.com/profile/4236373

Constance Lavender is an HIV-Positive pseudonymous freelance e-journalist from a little isle off the coast of Jersey; New Jersey, that is...

In the Best spirit of Silence Dogood and Benj. Franklin, Ms. Lavender believes that a free (more...)
 
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

under the pretext that oil is renewable and unend... by Alessandro Machi on Tuesday, Jun 26, 2007 at 9:53:31 PM
...as he has claimed. Or Roberts as well who... by chariotdrvr14 on Thursday, Jun 28, 2007 at 7:57:54 AM