Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

Judge Vaughn Walker--Should He STAY or Should He Go Back In The Closet?

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Funny 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

opednews.com

Judge Vaughn Walker is ruling on whether the unconstitutional Proposition 8 in California should be allowed to deny gay people the right to marry...at least until it reaches the Roberts-Scalito Supreme Court.

::::::::

You knew it was gonna happen.

After last week's landmark ruling overturning California's Proposition 8, saying it is unconstitutional to deny gay people the right to marry, there have been hues and cries and whispers that Judge Vaughn Walker, Chief Judge of the District Court of Northern California should be impeached.

Why? Because he upheld the Constitution. The argument from the homophobic sector is that he unilaterally dismissed the votes of more than 7-million Californians (partially bought using more than $20-million dollars from The Mormon Church). But once upon a time, millions of Californians also voted that it was illegal to allow blacks to marry white people too. Was it wrong for a court to deny the popular plebiscite in that case?

Also, Judge Walker is gay. I know, "so what?" I hear you saying. And I agree. But now the National Organization for Marriage who supported Prop 8 (and who will fight this all the way to the Roberts-Alito Supreme Court) are arguing that Judge Walker should have recused himself from the case because he actually has a dog in this fight. Supposedly the good Judge has been in a long-term stable relationship...WITH ANOTHER MAN! Oh. My! God!

And supposedly that makes him biased when it comes to ruling on the Constitutionality of voters taking away the rights of a minority group which includes the Judge himself.

But allow me to pose this rhetorical question: If we had a different judge on the case...let's say, oh, I don't know...perhaps a normal red-blooded heterosexual American male who likes girls...and let's say, hmmmm, that just maybe this hypothetical straight guy judge was MARRIED to a woman of the opposite sex...


WOULD THAT JUDGE HAVE TO RECUSE HIMSELF BECAUSE HE WAS STRAIGHT AND NOT IN A GAY MARRIAGE?

Sorry, my head hurts. But that's what comes from attempting to apply logic to irrational emotional arguments about sex, race, religion, and politics.

Anyway, the news today is that Judge Walker is about to rule on the STAY. That is, should Proposition 8 be allowed to remain in effect (denying gay folks the right to marry) until the case has wound its way through the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and all the way up to Messrs. Roberts-Alito-Scalia-Thomas-
Kennedy across the street from Capitol Hill?

Although I want to see Prop 8 go away TODAY, my bet is that the good Judge, the biased unrepentant gay Judge, will rule to allow the stay to remain in place. And Prop 8 will continue denying rights to gay people until this stupid thing is decided by the Supreme Court. Why? Because Judge Walker is a prudent jurist, and the Courts tend to err on the side of the status quo until all appeals have been heard.

That's just the way it is, baby.

Until then, we have the satisfaction of knowing that Judge Walker made the correct ruling, despite the alleged disenfranchisement of California voters, and that the Constitution still rules. At least on paper.

Loving V. "What's race got to do, got to do with it?" Virginia

http://www.markfiore.com/email/lt/t_go.php?i=153&e=MzU0ODY=&l=-http--www.markfiore.com/

 

Eric Malone has been writing about politics with a sardonic sense of humor through more than one apocalyptic Administration. He is a subversive dedicated to revolution through thoughtful laughter.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
The "Progressive, Tough, Liberal," Op-Ed News is i... by Tracy Hall Jr on Monday, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:08:57 PM
The $200-million was a fat-finger typo--it should ... by Eric Malone on Monday, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:20:27 PM