Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
40 comments

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 12/2/12

Chemtrail Nonsense?

By (about the author)     Permalink

Become a Fan
  (34 fans)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

opednews.com

Those purporting sinister behavior behind chemtrails have much to explain, near as I can tell. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which we have yet to see.

::::::::


chemtrails


http://www.nmsr.org/chemtrls.htm

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv_545uaOYI

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQz3aZtbF-c

 

http://contrailscience.com/how-to-debunk-chemtrails/

 

http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/chemtrails/

 

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C2GPCK_enUS366&hl=en&tbo=d&site=&source=hp&q=chemtrails+debunked&oq=chemtrails&gs_l=hp.3.1.0l10.1232.3006.0.5253.10.9.0.1.1.0.163.1063.3j6.9.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.6EL927wQ0-4

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4kkCijEYpg

 

 

 

http://www.hyperblimp.com

My senatorial political platform can be found here: www.voteutah.us. I encourage you to check it out and pass it along (assuming you like it, and particularly if you're disenchanted with Senator Hatch). If you have friends in Utah, so much the (more...)
 
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines
Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
40 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Not again. by Chris Cook on Sunday, Dec 2, 2012 at 5:34:23 PM
I posted many links on the topic of organic gardening. by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:30:18 AM
Suspicious behavior by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:43:33 PM
Reply to Peter, in bold: by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:29:25 PM
Note to Peter: by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:31:46 PM
Question mark: To Dan Geery by Chris Cook on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:12:01 PM
I hear you, trust me! And no problem or offense taken. by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:34:32 PM
the good side by Ned Lud on Sunday, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:31:44 PM
I examined it this morning, by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:33:18 PM
CAN I BELIEVE MY LYING EYES? by John Reed on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:05:44 AM
Responses to John, in italics: by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:42:00 PM
There were many by intotheabyss on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:21:24 PM
A very good question. by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:00:59 PM
Three links from "why are contrails by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:05:38 PM
This took place at mid day by intotheabyss on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:28:58 PM
I obviously don't know. by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:36:09 AM
Maybe you have a pat answer for this, too? by Rain Bojangles on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:24:09 AM
The answers are up there. by Rain Bojangles on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:10:59 AM
Two different colored exhaust trails, one jet. by Rain Bojangles on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:50:09 AM
Blind Justice by Rain Bojangles on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:21:51 PM
I gave you one more + by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:45:08 PM
Sinister? Is bad science "sinister"? Maybe. Maybe not. by Rain Bojangles on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:40:31 AM
I'm sure Geery can defend himself, Rain. by Gentry L Rowsey on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:01:13 AM
I just spent about thirty minutes writing a reply by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:03:04 AM
Reply to Bojangles, my answers in regular print: by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:59:56 PM
Who is "we"? by Rain Bojangles on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:43:16 AM
Chemtrails and Weather Modification by Chris Cook on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:59:39 PM
Chris, thanks for taking the time to present this. by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:34:43 PM
Denis Rancourt on Co2 AGW by Chris Cook on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:32:34 PM
I was overall actually impressed with the paper by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:35:32 PM
I agree. by Chris Cook on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:02:03 PM
chemtrails by Frank McCord on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:35:31 PM
I greatly appreciate where you're coming from, by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:48:56 AM
possibilities by Frank McCord on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:20:19 AM
You may be interested in this link, by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:41:33 PM
youre affirming theres no such thing as chemtrails? by jezreel liston on Tuesday, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:35:22 PM
The burden of proof is on the one who by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:40:40 AM
BTW, I can't see by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:49:52 AM
Chemtrails by Chris Cook on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:51:05 PM
I'd say without hesitation that by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:47:14 PM