Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 32 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 4/27/11

CHENEY WAS RIGHT ABOUT ONE THING: DEFICITS DON'T MATTER

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   13 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ellen Brown
Become a Fan
  (210 fans)

 

"Deficit terrorists" are gutting governments and forcing the privatization of public assets, all in the name of "deficit reduction."   But deficits aren't actually a bad thing.   In today's monetary scheme, in which most money comes from debt, debt and deficits are actually necessary to have a stable money supply.   The public debt is the people's money.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney famously said, "Deficits don't matter."   A staunch Republican, he was arguing against raising taxes on the rich; but today Republicans seem to have forgotten this maxim.   They are bent on stripping social programs, privatizing public assets, and gutting unions, all in the name of "deficit reduction."  

Worse, Standard & Poor's has now taken up the hatchet.   Some bloggers are calling it blackmail.   This private, for-profit rating agency, with a dubious track record of its own, is dictating government policy, threatening to downgrade the government's long-held triple AAA credit rating if Congress fails to deal with its deficit in sufficiently draconian fashion.   The threat is a real one, as we've seen with the devastating effects of downgrades in Greece, Ireland and other struggling countries.   Lowered credit ratings force up interest rates and cripple national budgets.  

The biggest threat to the dollar's credit rating, however, may be the game of chicken being played with the federal debt ceiling.   Nearly 70 percent of Americans are said to be in favor of a freeze on May 16, when the ceiling is due to be raised; and Tea Party-oriented politicians could go along with this scheme to please their constituents.

If they get what they wish for, the party could be over for the whole economy.   The Chinese are dumping U.S. Treasuries, and the Fed is backing off from its "quantitative easing" program, in which it has been buying federal securities with money simply created on its books.   When the Fed buys Treasuries, the government gets the money nearly interest-free, since the Fed rebates its profits to the government after deducting its costs.   When the Chinese and the Fed quit buying Treasuries, interest rates are liable to shoot up; and with a frozen debt ceiling, the government would have to default, since any interest increase on a $14 trillion debt would be a major expenditure.   Today the Treasury is paying a very low .25% on securities of 9 months or less, and interest on the whole debt is about 3% (a total of $414 billion on a debt of $14 trillion in 2010).   Greece is paying 4.5% on its debt, and Venezuela is paying 18% -- six times the 3% we're paying on ours.   Interest at 18% would add $2 trillion to our tax bill.   That would mean paying three times what we're paying now in personal income taxes (projected to be a total of $956 billion in 2011), just to cover the interest.  

There are other alternatives.   Congress could cut the military budget -- but it probably won't, since this option is never even discussed.   It could raise taxes on the rich, but that probably won't happen either.   A third option is to slash government services.   But which services?   How about social security?   Do you really want to see Grandma panhandling?   Congress can't agree on a budget for good reason: there is no good place to cut.  

Fortunately, there is a more satisfactory solution.   We can sit back, relax, and concede that Cheney was right.   Deficits aren't necessarily a bad thing!   They don't matter, so long as they are at very low interest rates; and they can be kept at these very low rates either by maintaining our triple A credit rating or by borrowing from the Fed essentially interest-free.  

The Yin and Yang of Money

Under our current monetary scheme, debt and deficits not only don't matter but are actually necessary in order to maintain a stable money supply.  The reason wa s explained by Marriner Eccles, Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, in hearings before the House Committee on Banking and Currency in 1941.   Wright Patman asked Eccles how the Federal Reserve got the money to buy government bonds. 

"We created it," Eccles replied.

 "Out of what?"                                                                

 "Out of the right to issue credit money."

"And there is nothing behind it, is the re, except our government's credit?"

"That is what our money system is," Eccles replied.  "If there were no debts in our money system, there wouldn't be any money."

That could explain why the U.S. debt hasn't been paid off since 1835.   It has just continued to grow, and the economy has grown and flourished along with it.   A debt that is never paid off isn't really a debt.   Financial planner Mark Pash calls it a National Monetization Account .   Government bonds (or debt) are "monetized" (or turned into money).   Government bonds and dollar bills are the yin and yang of the money supply, the negative and positive sides of the national balance sheet.   To have a plus-1 on one side of the balance sheet, a minus-1 needs to be created on the other.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 6   Well Said 4   News 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ellen Brown Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the best-selling WEB OF DEBT. In THE PUBLIC BANK SOLUTION, her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically and (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It's the Derivatives, Stupid! Why Fannie, Freddie and AIG Had to Be Bailed Out

Mysterious Prison Buses in the Desert

LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

Libya: All About Oil, or All About Central Banking?

Borrowing from Peter to Pay Paul: The Wall Street Ponzi Scheme Called Fractional Reserve Banking

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend