|
Bush's
Deadly Deception
In
Our Name; "Oops", is
no excuse for war.
Patricia
Ernest (Pissed
Off Patricia's Blog )
OpEdNews.com
The
invasion of, and resulting war in, Iraq should not have
occurred. Bush told us we were in eminent danger due to Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction. He said we must go to war to protect
our country from an attack. The latest report says there were no wmd
in Iraq at the time the US invaded and began its occupation. The
media, in lockstep with the administration, will try to lay the blame for
the miscue on the intelligence agencies. You can blame it on
the Bossa Nova or the devil or whatever, but blame and ignorance is no
excuse when the result is death. "Oops", is no
excuse for war. The bottom line is, it happened on bush's
watch, therefore it's bush's problem and he must deal with it. You
can't change the rules after the game begins and you can't change the goal
after the game is over. This war in Iraq is still a war, and to
change the reason at this point, based on new information, just will not
wash with the American people and certainly not with the rest of the
world.
Don't
you wonder why so many Americans were against this war in the first
place? Not all Americans who were against this war are against all
wars. Many weren't anti war. They
were anti invasion based on what they perceived to be anti
truth. Many of us were against this war, because before the war
began, the UN weapons inspectors reported that they had not found any
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We, unlike the President,
watched the inspector's reports on tv. It's just as simple as
that. When Powell appeared before the UN with his aerial photos of
trucks near buildings and his recordings of conversations, the UN
inspectors, in so many words, reported that all of Powell's evidence was
useless and unfounded. I, along with you, believed them, and
apparently everyone else should have as well. The longer the
inspectors searched the less they found. Perhaps the administration
felt that the public might actually notice that no weapons were being
found, and perhaps that was why they rushed into this war when they
did. The obvious was becoming more obvious with every report.
Maybe
when Saddam sent his report regarding his weapons, and the US demanded to
have the report before other countries were given their copies, maybe
there was something in that original report that would have shown
that he had nothing. I don't know. What I do know is that
as a result of a US invasion, over 500 of our soldiers now lay dead, and
many, many more lay wounded. Soldiers from other countries now lay
dead, and who knows how many thousands of innocent Iraqis now lay
dead. What should the US say? Do we say, "I'm sorry, I
guess we got some bad info, but remember, Saddam also killed a lot of
people"? Is that enough? If this war was fought
because Washington didn't believe the UN inspectors, is it enough to try
to justify it now based on new reasons? Is it enough if the new
reasons sound good but are not true reasons? Do we invade countries,
kill thousands and then change our reasons for doing so? Is that
America? Have we become so hardened that we really don't care why we
killed thousands of human beings? Is that the result of what 9-11
did to us? Did the attacks of 9-11 turn us to the same sort
of mindset as the terrorists. Do we now kill human beings
and worry about the reasons later? The attacks of 9-11 were Osama's
way of making a statement. Did we invade Iraq just to make a
statement? That's not the way we do things in the United States,
and, I don't believe we would condone or tolerate these same actions
if they had been taken by any other country. We didn't condone
Saddam's invasion of Kuwait did we?
Imagine, with
the history of this war, that another country, we'll call that
country Lieland, had done the very same things that we have
done in Iraq, and that all Lieland's actions had been condemned by
the US from the beginning. Just imagine that Lieland had invaded
Iraq, based on the declaration that Iraq was a threat to Lieland. The
administration of Lieland said that Iraq possessed wmd.
These were declarations that we Americans believed to be untrue.
Imagine how we would have felt if we had seen Lieland dropping the
shock and awe bombs. Imagine how we would have felt as we
thought about the innocent Iraqis as they were being murdered from
above. Imagine that we heard that there were no weapons found
in Iraq and that Lieland's leaders were simply blowing that news off
and instead bragging that they had freed the Iraqi people. Imagine
that we saw the conditions in Iraq today and heard that the soldiers
from Lieland were going door to door in Iraq, crashing down the doors of
homes, and arresting thousands of Iraqis. These Iraqis were
being kept in prisons based only on a suspicion and there
was news that the prisoners were being unfairly treated. Imagine
that the very first thing Lieland secured after their invasion was Iraq's
oil fields. Lieland allowed Iraq to be looted, but protected the oil
fields. Lieland would look like a heartless opportunistic
country to us and to the rest of the world. Just imagine
seeing all of that. Now try to imagine how other countries
are seeing us today.
Keeping
your imagination going for a moment, please imagine what you would think
of Lielanders if they re-elected the same President who had led them
into that atrocious war. By re-electing this same President, they
would be telling the rest of the world that they endorsed his
actions. By supporting this president, Lielanders would tell
the world they had no remorse regarding what their leader had
done. If you had wondered about the citizens of Lieland before,
you would feel that by their re-election of their President, that they
were just as dangerous and heartless as their President. You would
feel that if their leader presented himself as a man guided by
religion, it must be the kind of religion that endorses and
condones war and murder based on lies. Lieland
would appear to be a danger to all people.
We
are Lieland and we are at a pivotal point in history. If we
re-elect bush (and yes, I know he was never truly elected), we will be
telling the world that we support what he has done to our country, to Iraq
and to the world. I don't want the world to think that we are, in
any way, akin to bush in either thought or deed. I want to show the
world that we are wiser and kinder than the president. I don't want
us to be Democrats or Republicans. I
want us to be Americans who stand up and show the world that we
recognize what has taken place in our name, and that we will take action
to see that it never happens again. We owe it to ourselves and to
our forefathers to demand honesty from our leaders, especially
when the consequence of dishonesty is death. We have a debt and a
responsibility to protect our soldiers and to see that they are never
forced to enter into a contrived or a preventable war. Our
country is headed down a frightening, ugly and dangerous path, and we
must do everything in our power to change directions before we completely
lose our way and discover that there is no turning back.
patricia
I am a mom to Murphy (my precious
pup) and Fred (my occasionally precious cat).
I share my life, my
laughter, my world and all of my love with my husband and have
for 16 years.
I would describe myself as a very
sentimental and sensitive person who is forever willing to share my
point of view whether or not it has been requested of
me. This article is copyright by Patricia
Ernest, originally published by opednews.com
Permission is granted to forward this or to place it on a website as
long as the article is included intact, including this statement.
Patricia is also the author of Pissed
Off Patricia's Blog
|
|