Contribute $$ to OpEdNews

NEW OpedNews Forums

Click Here to Access Hundreds of Fresh News & Opinion Articles

-Classics of Liberal Thinking
-archives of articles by our
  regular contributors
-Progressive Radio Links
-OpEdNews.Com Site Map

Tell A Friend

 

Whispering in Bush's Ear
by Ernest Partridge

Like my partner, Bernie Weiner, I am intrigued by a theory that has emerged from the fringes of left-wing fantasyland, and is slowly acquiring some plausibility and exposure.

Was George Bush, in the first debate, “wired for sound?” Did he have a listening device which fed him directions and cues during the debate?

While there is no solid evidence, there are several intriguing clues. A mysterious bulge in the back of Bush’s suit jacket. Those awkward pauses during his delivery. And a strange interjection of “let me finish,” sixty seconds into a ninety second response, when neither Lehrer nor Kerry gave any indication of an interruption.

But I’ll let others supply the grounds for this theory. (Begin with Bernard Weiner's blog, then follow the links).

This intriguing notion of “the wired President” reminds me of another incident.

Several years ago, James Randi, a former magician and a MacArthur "Genius grant" awardee, engineered a masterful debunking. A televangelist named Peter Popov displayed an amazing ability to walk up to total strangers in his audience, address them by name and describe their life histories and their ailments in detail. Then one of Randi's assistants intercepted a wireless message from Popov's wife to a listening device in Popov's ear. The wife read out information that the audience members had previously written on a personnel form. Randi's crew then combined the audio track of Mrs. Popov's sweet nothings into Popov's ear, with the video of the revival meeting.

That clip was played on The Tonight Show (during the Carson era, I believe). I have seen it, and it is devastating.

Back to time-present. Just imagine someone capturing the signal from Karl Rove or Karen Hughes (or whomever) to Bush during the debate. Suppose he did so for the first hour of the debate, and then, during the final half-hour, broadcasted a loud jamming signal into Bush's ear.

With all the internet “chatter” about “the wired Shrub,” we can be confident that if in fact Bush used a listening device, the Bush crew is aware of the danger of an intercepted signal.

This puts Bush in an agonizing dilemma. On the one hand, continue to use the device in which case, there is a danger of exposure. On the other hand, give it up – cut the “lifeline” and leave Dubya on his own behind that lectern.

Maybe we will, at long last, encounter the unscripted Bush, facing ninety minutes of time to fill.

Could be very interesting!
 
Enter Your E-mail address to Receive OpEdNews Newsletter Tell A Friend  Contribute $$ to OpEdNews