The US Army May be at a Breaking Point.
info made accessible by OpEdNews.com
That's the conclusion of a report written for the Army.
The washington post covered the report:
Scathing New Army War College Report Broadly Criticizes Bush admin on handling of the war on terrorism, accusing it of taking a detour into an "unnecessary" war in Iraq and pursuing an "unrealistic" quest against terrorism that may lead to U.S. wars with states that pose no serious threat. Why is this on page 12 of the Washington Post? It should be Page one!
Here's an incredible indictment of the incompetence and failure of the Bush policy on terrorism and most newspapers ignore it. Fox and CNN ignore it, and the Washington Post puts it on page 12. You can click on the link above to read the Washington Post article, and the original article is
Here's the link to the whole report, followed by some excerpts. This is worth reading. it makes it so crystal clear that the use of the term WAR ON TERRORISM may be morally clear but it's untrue, misleading and had led the US down the wrong path in defending itself against terrorism.
Some excerpts: :
"the administration has postulated a multiplicity of enemies, including rogue states; weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proliferators; terrorist organizations of global, regional, and national scope; and terrorism itself. It also seems to have confl ated them into a monolithic threat, and in so doing has subordinated strategic clarity to the moral clarity it strives for in foreign policy and may have set the United States on a course of open-ended and gratuitous confl ict with states and nonstate entities that pose no serious threat to the United States.
Of particular concern has been the confl ation of al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein
