Every detail of the Michael Jackson case will be thoroughly
covered by the media for the duration of his trial. What is
tragically lacking are the facts regarding pedophiles and sexual
abuse of children.
Studies reveal 62% of girls and 31% of boys will be sexually
abused by age 18 and this statistic is considered to be low.
Contrary to popular belief, 80% of children are sexually abused by
a family member, 19% are abused by someone the child knows and
trusts; and government statistics report 1% are abused by
strangers.
The unbelievable reality is that a person who sexually abuses
children may seem very average and ordinary to the world. He or
she may be a leader in the church, in the community or in
business. Pedophiles seldom fit a classic stereotype and they are
not necessarily uneducated, unemployed, impoverished or an
alcoholic. Pedophilia has no boundaries with regard to education,
socioeconomic status, career or cultural background. Furthermore,
we find sexual abuse and incest even more difficult to believe or
accept when the person we like, admire, love, and/or marry is the
perpetrator of the abuse. Therefore, that is precisely why Michael
Jackson’s family, fans and the uninformed can unequivocally
believe he could not possibly be a sexual abuse perpetrator.
Pedophiles are cunning predators, who have perfected their mode
of operation. First and foremost they are experts at manipulation,
thus escaping adult reality. They have a sense of entitlement and
justify their behavior as loving; not harming the child. They
expend great energy maintaining this illusion to themselves as
well as others. They create a persona of goodness beyond reproach.
They go to great lengths to present themselves as exemplary
people, who love children more than most people. Anyone who sees
through this façade is met with admonishment and rebuke for being
critical, irrational, racist, out to get the person, and/or
jealous. The perpetrator is the family emperor with no clothes. "I
know my son, and this is ridiculous," Michael Jackson’s mother,
Katherine Jackson, said in an interview broadcast on CBS "The
Early Show." She said people who believe Michael is guilty "don't
know him." Jackson's father, Joe Jackson, said his son was beloved
around the world but had trouble in the United States because of
racism. He said the accuser's motives were clear: "It's about
money."
Even more frightening about sexual abuse and incest
perpetrators is that within their pathology they do not hold
beliefs reflecting society’s moral and ethical values. Therefore,
coupled with the child’s innocence and trust of the abuser usually
pressure or violence is not required. Thus, the perpetrator can
unequivocally state, “I love children. Never-ever. I could never
harm a child or anyone. It’s not in my heart. It’s not who I am.”
Jane F. Giligun and Teresa M. Connor conducted a study of 14
male sexual abuse perpetrators ranging in age from twenty-one to
fifty-four. All these men believed that they had deep and loving
relationships with their victims. As one man said, “We had a
relationship. Right or Wrong, it was a relationship.” I am not
suggesting that everyone who goes above and beyond the call of
duty for children in their care—for example school teachers,
coaches, clergy, et al are pedophiles. However, insidiously,
perpetrators demonstrate the right, moral and exemplary behavior
to develop credibility and establish proof of their love of
children. These actions therefore thwart any suspicion of
wrongdoing, thus allowing the pedophile access to lure the
innocent trusting child and/or parent into letting their guard
down and their common sense and suspicions to blur.
Michael Jackson has a even more insidious aspect to his contact
with children--he presents himself as a benevolent benefactor for
children with a life threatening illness to have some fun and
happiness, and in so doing recapture his lost childhood. With his
money, fame and childlike persona the parents see an opportunity
to give their child something they can not and the children
thinks they are the lucky chosen ones.
Using the definition of sexual abuse, Michael
Jackson’s practice of soliciting young boys for companionship
under the guise of helping them with a life threatening illness
and/or sleeping with young boys, albeit according to him, he slept
on the floor and the child slept in his bed, is in and of itself
abuse. Having said the aforementioned, the definition of sexual
abuse is necessary.
Traditionally, incest was defined as "sexual intercourse
between two persons too closely related to marry legally--sex
between siblings, first cousins, the seduction by fathers of their
daughters." This dysfunctional blood relationship, however, does
not completely describe what children are experiencing. To fully
understand all sexual abuse, we need to look beyond the blood bond
and include the emotional bond between the victim and his or her
perpetrator. Thus, a new definition has emerged. The new
definition now relies less on the blood bond between the victim
and the perpetrator and more on the experience of the child.
"Incest [sexual abuse] is both sexual abuse and an abuse of
power. It is violence that does not require force. Another is
using the victim, treating them in a way that they do not want or
in a way that is not appropriate by a person with whom a different
relationship is required. It is abuse because it does not take
into consideration the needs or wishes of the child; rather, it
meets the needs of the other person at the child's expense. If the
experience has sexual meaning for another person, in lieu of a
nurturing purpose for the benefit of the child, it is abuse. If it
is unwanted or inappropriate for her age or the relationship, it
is abuse. Incest [sexual abuse] can occur through words, sounds,
or even exposure of the child to sights or acts that are sexual
but do not involve her. If she is forced to see what she does not
want to see, for instance, by an exhibitionist, it is abuse. If a
child is forced into an experience that is sexual in content or
overtone that is abuse. As long as the child is induced into
sexual activity with someone who is in a position of greater
power, whether that power is derived through the perpetrator’s
age, size, status, or relationship, the act is abusive. A child
who cannot refuse, or who believes she or he cannot refuse, is a
child who has been violated." (E. Sue Blume, Secret Survivors).
Author bio: Dorothy M.
Neddermeyer is noted for her pioneering work in sexual child abuse
prevention and recovery. She is an author, lecturer and seminar
leader on a variety of subjects. A Certified Regression
Therapist, a Diplomate with the International Academy of
Behavorial Medicine, Counseling and Psychotherapy, Inc. a
Diplomate with the National Board of Certified Clinical
Hypnotherapists and a life member of Who's Who in American Women
since 2000. Genesis
Consultants, Inc.
http://www.gen-assist.com
Author
-If I'd Only Known...Sexual Abuse in or out of the Family: A
Guide to Prevention.