KERRY, EDWARDS & KUCINICH ON JOBS
by Thomas McCullock
OpEdNews.com
In last night's debate between the democratic candidates, Dennis Kucinich
challenged both John Kerry and John Edwards to pledge to cancel NAFTA to
protect jobs. Both refused, claiming they would instead "fix"
NAFTA.
As Mr. Kucinich points out, that's impossible. We do not have the
authority to do so, the WTO would simply overrule any such attempt. Our
only option is to withdraw from this misguided treaty which has for years
enslaved the poor in other countries, and now steals jobs from American
workers.
Americans were willing to accept NAFTA when it looked like it resulted in
the servitude of workers in other countries, bringing lower prices to
stores like Wal-Mart. But today, NAFTA is causing the loss of millions of
jobs in the US, as corporations shift work to virtually indentured workers
outside of our borders, and away from US labor protections. The only
winner under NAFTA is the corporations looking for cheaper and cheaper
labor. Make no mistake, NAFTA isn't about The USA vs. Other Countries,
it's Corporations vs. Everyone Else.
John Kerry voted for NAFTA, and now refuses to repeal it. Both Kerry and
Edwards voted for the China agreement (aka the Wal-Mart Jackpot). Only
Dennis Kucinich has vowed to cancel NAFTA as his first official act as
President.
Which candididate do you think has interests of the American worker in
mind, and which are merely front men for out of control corporations
looking for cheap labor?
Thomas McCullock is an activist with the Springs
Action Alliance, and editor of ThomasMc.com |
|