|
Transforming
the Middle East… or Hogwash?
A Common Sense Editorial
Jesse Lee
www.opednews.com
With its stated reasons for
going to war kaput, namely the MIA WMD and the utterly unsubstantiated
link to Al Qaeda, the administration has launched a new PR campaign,
attempting to frame the war in Iraq as part of Grand Plan to democratize
the Middle East. To those in Washington who had followed the run-up to
war, this rhetoric sounds distastefully familiar. It echoes the ideology
of the so-called Neoconservative movement, which has been spearheaded by a
handful of prominent and behind-the-scenes think tanks, most notably the
Project for a New American Century, or PNAC. PNAC has been calling for war
in Iraq for many years, deep into the Clinton presidency, and obviously
well
before 9/11. Their roster has included Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Perle,
and perhaps a dozen other high-ranking administration officials. Don’t
believe us? See for your self at:
www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
A handful of commentators have dared entertain the obvious possibility
that the war was motivated by this ideology, and not by the WMD that the
administration harped on for over a year. This sort of bait-and-switch
would be dastardly enough. To sell the American people on sending their
sons and daughters to kill and die on anything short of the real and true
rationale is an act as abhorrent as any an American president could
undertake. Does Common Sense think that this is the case, and that some Grand Plan
for democracy in the Middle East was the real, secret motivation for the
war? No. We think it is worse than that.
Let us take a good look at the Middle East and evaluate whether such Grand
Plans are at all realistic. When political movers and shakers speak of the
Middle East, they are implicitly speaking of one country above all others:
Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia provided 15 of the 19 hijackers for 9/11, and
is by far the greatest breeding ground for anti-American fundamentalism.
It also holds 1/3 of the world’s oil underneath its sands. A dangerous
combination.
So what would happen if we were to bring democracy to this nation, whose
citizens hold approximately a 2-3% approval rating of the US? Robert Baer,
a former CIA analyst in the Middle East provides one answer: “Osama bin
Laden would be elected in a landslide”. If there were free elections,
fundamentalists would be easily elected, and could then use their
mind-boggling oil reserves as a powerful political weapon. America’s
posture of domination in the region would come to an abrupt halt, and the
threat of the Saudis destroying their own oil infrastructure, thereby
crippling both the American and world economies, would be a threat
equivalent to a nuclear bomb. Especially to an administration which
includes 41 oil executives.
So if there are such Grand Plans, the administration better find a way to
fence democracy out of Saudi Arabia. Same goes for the United Arab
Emirates and Qatar. In fact, throughout the Middle East, even in Syria,
the populations of those countries are far more hostile to American
interests than are the dictators. Does Mr. Bush really mean to say that he
will allow fundamentalists to take control of all of the Middle East oil
reserves, and that he will allow them to have fully functioning armies,
perhaps including chemical and biological weapons?
No, he doesn’t, and that is why his talk of Grand Plans includes not a
single iota of new policy. And are we really to believe that while they
were busy crafting grand plans to instill democracy across the entire
region, they simply forgot to lay out a plan for how they would do that in
Iraq. Don’t forget, there was no plan. Nothing.
Well, that’s not exactly true. There were indeed detailed plans for
protecting the oil infrastructure. And with the Saudi Arabian royal family
teetering on the brink of being overcome by the fundamentalists in their
mists, the real motivation for the war might be apparent.
Faced with the coming
possibility that Saudi Arabia would be taken over by fundamentalists, the
administration was faced with two possibile options:
1)
Begin a
genuine attempt to win the hearts and minds of the Arab people.
If democracy is ever to come to the region, and certainly we all
hope it does, then at some point the only tactical option to prevent those
nations from becoming fervent ememies of the United States would be to
befriend those people, to win their trust, and to gradually bring them
into the free human family.
2)
Begin a
fierce campaign to dominate the Middle East.
Invading Iraq secured as much as 20% of the world’s oil under US
control with Halliburton equipment. As
Robert Kagan, a leading neoconservative said, “We will probably need a major concentration of forces in the Middle
East over a long period of time…When we have economic problems, it's
been caused by disruptions in our oil supply. If we have a force in Iraq,
there will be no disruption in oil supplies.” The war
would also establish an intimidating military presence, ready to pounce if
things got out of control in Saudi Arabia or elsewhere.
The
administration took the second option, and unfortunately it will be very
difficult to change course now. It
would be nice if they could restrain themselves from giving their cronies
billion dollar contracts (the GOP recently stripped an anti-profiteering
amendment from the $87B Iraq spending bill), but it is even more important
to shift perspectives. The
administration is now in over its head, it needs to ask for help, and it
needs to change course.
Above all
though, it is time to start leveling with the American people. By posing as some sort of Churchill, visionary figure, and by
pretending that they did not sell the war on an imminent threat, they
insult the American people and disgrace the brave men and women who have
put their lives at risk without receiving an honest reason for doing so.
Common
Sense
certainly does not begrudge the people of the Middle East their freedom.
If we felt Bush’s words were in earnest, we would certainly applaud
them. But we also recognize
that largely because of the Iraq war and other unilateral arrogance,
combined with a dangerous fanaticism that borders on mass brainwashing,
the people of the Middle East harbor a tremednous hatred for the US.
We recognize that a democratic Middle East, even just a democratic
Saudi Arabia, would truly be a grave threat to American security.
We also believe that Dick Cheney and George Bush understand this as
well, witch is why we are convinced that President Bush’s rhetoric is
insincere. We want and need
to trust out president in a time of crisis, please allow us to do so.
Common
Sense is a newsletter containing a bulleted news summary of the
most damning mainstream news stories and one opinion piece, chosen or
written to be poignant but not strident in tone.
Common Sense is operated by Jesse Lee in conjunction with Rob Kall
of www.opednews.com
. To receive Common Sense in your inbox every two weeks, email Jesse at commonsense@opednews.com.
He co-operates the blog www.moneyjungle.org
and is a founding contributor to the platform of 2020
Democrats. This article is copyright by Jesse Lee,published by OpEdNews.com,
but permission is granted for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media
so long as this entire credit paragraph is attached |
|